Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Under fire, Napolitano halts projects for review

By EILEEN SULLIVAN

WASHINGTON (AP) - Facing criticism for her handling of federal stimulus money, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she would not start any new border construction projects while the department reviewed how projects were selected.

Napolitano has faced questions since The Associated Press reported last month that Homeland Security officials did not follow their internal priority lists when choosing which border checkpoints would get money for renovations. Under a process that is secretive and susceptible to political influence, officials planned to spend millions at tiny checkpoints, passing over busier, higher-priority projects. ....

'Miranda warning' for Pledge of Allegiance?



(Fox News) Some are advocating a "Miranda warning" for the Pledge -- an administrative notice to students that they have the right to remain silent ...

Companies Patch OS Holes, but Biggest Priority Should Be Apps

by Ellen Messmer

Corporations appear to be much slower in patching their applications than their operating systems -- even though attackers are mainly targeting vulnerabilities in applications, according to a new report.
"Now we know which vulnerabilities are being patched and which are not," says Alan Paller, director of research at the SANS Institute.

The report, "The Top Cyber Security Risks," is based on data collected between March and August and was a collaborative effort by SANS, TippingPoint and Qualys. The group analyzed six months of data related to online attacks, collected from 6,000 organizations using the TippingPoint intrusion-prevention system, along with data related to more than 100 million vulnerability scans performed on behalf of 9,000 customers of the Qualys vulnerability assessment service.

The report shows that 80% of Microsoft operating system vulnerabilities are being patched within 60 days, but only 40% of applications, including Office and Adobe. Meanwhile, the majority of online attacks are aimed at applications, particularly client-side applications, making this the No. 1 priority named in the report.

During the six-month timeframe, more than 60% of all attack attempts monitored by TippingPoint were against Web applications in order to convert trusted Web sites into malicious sites serving up malware and attack code to vulnerable client-side applications. The main attack methods used against Web sites were SQL injection and cross-site scripting. ....

Now Protesters are KKK applicants, not merely racists

(Analyst's note: These politicians clearly run in different circles than me. I'm simply not seeing or hearing what is being spoken of here on the street.)

By LisaB

Are you tired of white racism being the reason for any opposition to Obama and his policies? Think that protesting his plans or talking about him negatively as a politician is part of your rights in a democratic society? Well, think again. Not only is it not right, now instead of merely racist, you’re on your way to a “white sale” for extra sheets, according to Rep Hank Johnson, D-GA and Rep Dingell, D-MI.

According to Johnson, the only thing keeping whitey from going all KKK on every other person in this country is “rebuking Joe Wilson.”

Seriously.

Rep. Joe Wilson’s outburst last week is drawing new recriminations from his colleagues, with a member of the Congressional Black Caucus suggesting that a failure to rebuke the South Carolina Republican is tantamount to supporting the most blatant form of organized racism in American history.

In an obvious reference to the Ku Klux Klan, Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., said Tuesday that people will be putting on “white hoods and white uniforms again and riding through the countryside” if emerging racist attitudes, which he says were subtly supported by Wilson, are not rebuked. He said Wilson must be disciplined as an example.

Of course, Rep Dingell, D-MI tried this line a couple of days ago too.

White sheets again. Is there a sale at Sears I’ve missed or something? Clearly being called a racist is no longer enough. Now it’s all about the KKK. What’s next?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carter: Racism plays major role in opposition to Obama



State Department Website Panders To Radical Islamists

by Steve Emerson

The United States government's stepped-up courting of Islamist groups is on display at the State Department web portal www.america.gov. The site bills itself as a place to "meet the people" and "explore the values and ideas that define the character of the United States." But when it comes to American Muslim organizations, that often means providing a U.S. government stamp of approval to organizations linked to the Muslim Brotherhood such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) or apologists like the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).
A September 4th podcast about President Obama's Community Service Initiative illustrates how the federal government gives free and favorable publicity to Brotherhood-linked Islamists. America.gov noted the contribution of Dalia Mogahed (a protégé of terror-apologist John Esposito) to the president's initiative. Mogahed and Esposito work together at the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies. The two collaborated in writing a book. Read a favorable review here.
The podcast added that Mogahed, executive director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies and a member of the President's Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, had launched www.MuslimServe.org, "a Web site that identifies a national goal of 1,000 service projects for Muslim Americans." It quoted at length from a speech Mogahed delivered to ISNA's national convention setting out principles for the president's initiative.
During the Cold War, government bureaus like the United States Information Agency worked to counter disinformation by driving home the point that freedom and democracy are superior to communism and tyranny. But Zuhdi Jasser, head of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, says that in today's struggle with radical Islam, the United States government is doing something very different – even perverse.
It is aiding and abetting the efforts of groups like CAIR and ISNA to anoint themselves representatives of all American Muslims – even though many Muslims want nothing to do with the Islamists. ....

AUDIO - Massive tax disguised as 'cap-and-trade' Analyst: Typical American family will see minimum hike of $1,761 per year

FBI unit set for more anti-terror raids in Queens; Fears of Madrid-style subway bombings - sources

By James Gordon Meek In Washington and Rocco Parascandola, Alison Gendar and Larry Mcshane

Fear was no excuse to condone torture

In the fear that followed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Americans were told that defeating Al Qaeda would require us to ``take off the gloves.'' As a former commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps and a retired commander-in-chief of U.S. Central Command, we knew that was a recipe for disaster.

But we never imagined that we would feel duty-bound to publicly denounce a vice president of the United States, a man who has served our country for many years. In light of the irresponsible statements recently made by former Vice President Dick Cheney, however, we feel we must repudiate his dangerous ideas -- and his scare tactics.

We have seen how ill-conceived policies that ignored military law on the treatment of enemy prisoners hindered our ability to defeat al Qaeda. We have seen American troops die at the hands of foreign fighters recruited with stories about tortured Muslim detainees at Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib. And yet Cheney and others who orchestrated America's disastrous trip to ``the dark side'' continue to assert -- against all evidence -- that torture ``worked'' and that our country is better off for having gone there.

In an interview with Fox News Sunday, Cheney applauded the ``enhanced interrogation techniques'' -- what we used to call ``war crimes'' because they violated the Geneva Conventions, which the United States instigated and has followed for 60 years. Cheney insisted the abusive techniques were ``absolutely essential in saving thousands of American lives and preventing further attacks against the United States.'' He claimed they were ``directly responsible for the fact that for eight years, we had no further mass casualty attacks against the United States. It was good policy . . . It worked very, very well.''

Repeating these assertions doesn't make them true. We now see that the best intelligence, which led to the capture of Saddam Hussein and the elimination of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was produced by professional interrogations using non-coercive techniques. When the abuse began, prisoners told interrogators whatever they thought would make it stop.

Torture is as likely to produce lies as the truth. And it did.

What leaders say matters. So when it comes to light, as it did recently, that U.S. interrogators staged mock executions and held a whirling electric drill close to the body of a naked, hooded detainee, and the former vice president winks and nods, it matters.

The Bush administration had already degraded the rules of war by authorizing techniques that violated the Geneva Conventions and shocked the conscience of the world. Now Cheney has publicly condoned the abuse that went beyond even those weakened standards, leading us down a slippery slope of lawlessness. Rules about the humane treatment of prisoners exist precisely to deter those in the field from taking matters into their own hands. They protect our nation's honor.

To argue that honorable conduct is only required against an honorable enemy degrades the Americans who must carry out the orders. As military professionals, we know that complex situational ethics cannot be applied during the stress of combat. The rules must be firm and absolute; if torture is broached as a possibility, it will become a reality. Moral equivocation about abuse at the top of the chain of command travels through the ranks at warp speed.

On Aug. 24, the United States took an important step toward moral clarity and the rule of law when a special task force recommended that in the future, the Army interrogation manual should be the single standard for all agencies of the U.S. government.

The unanimous decision represents an unusual consensus among the defense, intelligence, law enforcement and homeland security agencies. Members of the task force had access to every scrap of intelligence, yet they drew the opposite conclusion from Cheney's. They concluded that far from making us safer, cruelty betrays American values and harms U.S. national security.

On this solemn day we pause to remember those who lost their lives on 9/11. As our leaders work to prevent terrorists from again striking on our soil, they should remember the fundamental precept of counterinsurgency we've relearned in Afghanistan and Iraq: Undermine the enemy's legitimacy while building our own. These wars will not be won on the battlefield. They will be won in the hearts of young men who decide not to sign up to be fighters and young women who decline to be suicide bombers. If Americans torture and it comes to light -- as it inevitably will -- it embitters and alienates the very people we need most.

Our current commander-in-chief understands this. The task force recommendations take us a step closer to restoring the rule of law and the standards of human dignity that made us who we are as a nation. Repudiating torture and other cruelty helps keep us from being sent on fools' errands by bad intelligence. And in the end, that makes us all safer.

Charles C. Krulak was Commandant of the Marine Corps from 1995 to 1999. Joseph P. Hoar was Commander in Chief of U.S. Central Command from 1991 to 1994.

Obama Backs Extending Patriot Act Spy Provisions

By David Kravets

The Obama administration has told Congress it supports renewing three provisions of the Patriot Act due to expire at year’s end, measures making it easier for the government to spy within the United States.

In a letter to Sen. Patrick Leahy, the Vermont Democrat and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Justice Department said the administration might considermodifications” to the act in order to protect civil liberties.

“The administration is willing to consider such ideas, provided that they do not undermine the effectiveness of these important authorities,” Ronald Weich, assistant attorney general, wrote to Leahy, (.pdf) whose committee is expected to consider renewing the three expiring Patriot Act provisions next week. The government disclosed the letter Tuesday.

It should come as no surprise that President Barack Obama supports renewing the provisions, which were part of the Patriot Act approved six weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

As an Illinois senator in 2008, he voted to allow the warrantless monitoring of Americans’ electronic communications if they are communicating overseas with somebody the government believes is linked to terrorism. That legislative package, which President George W. Bush signed, also immunized the nation’s telecommunication companies from lawsuits charging them with being complicit with the Bush administration’s warrantless, wiretapping program. That program was also adopted in the wake of Sept. 11.

These are the three provisions due to expire:

*A secret court, known as the FISA court, may grant “roving wiretaps” without the government identifying the target. Generally, the authorities must assert that the target is an agent of a foreign power and/or a suspected terrorist. The government said Tuesday that 22 such warrants — which allow the monitoring of any communication device — have been granted annually.

*The FISA court may grant warrants for “business records,” from banking to library to medical records. Generally, the government must assert that the records are relevant to foreign intelligence gathering and/or a terrorism investigation. The government said Tuesday that 220 of these warrants had been granted between 2004 and 2007. It said 2004 was the first year those powers were used.

*A so-called “lone wolf” provision, enacted in 2004, allows FISA court warrants for the electronic monitoring of an individual even without showing that the person is an agent of a foreign power or a suspected terrorist. The government said Tuesday it has never invoked that provision, but said it wants to keep the authority to do so.

“The basic idea behind the authority was to cover situations in which information linking the target of an investigation to an international group was absent or insufficient, although the target’s engagement in ‘international terrorism’ was sufficiently established,” Weich wrote.

The American Civil Liberties opposes renewing all three provisions, especially the lone wolf measure.

Michelle Richardson, the ACLU’s legislative counsel, said in a telephone interview, “The justification for FISA and these lower standards and letting it operate in secret was all about terrorist groups and foreign governments, that they posed a unique threat other than the normal criminal element. This lone wolf provision undercuts that justification.”

The committee hearing is set for 10 a.m. Sept. 23 and will be webcast live.
See Also:

U.S. Intelligence Needs More than Another Report

With his slice of the $75 billion annual intelligence budget, top U.S. spymaster Adm. Dennis Blair today issued a thick report saying that a "deeper and broader understanding of threats and opportunities" is "necessary to ensure [success]."

We wish him luck. After all, if understanding what's going on in the world can't be bought for $75 billion a year, what good is U.S. intelligence?

The fact is, there are plenty of bright people laboring away in the analytical bowels of the CIA, Pentagon, etc. But what gets to the President too often is hyped and biased, according to another new report on U.S. intelligence, this one from the Brookings Institute.


That's long been the system. What U.S. intelligence really needs, it suggests, is a good old-fashioned city editor with a sharp blue pencil and a nose for b.s.

City editors, for example, regularly ask tough questions about a reporter's sources, which tends to pin-prick the balloons floating a story far beyond its mooring in facts.

But according to "The U.S. Intelligence Community and Foreign Policy: Getting Analysis Right," the CIA briefers hype their presidential daily briefs (PDFs) with references to hush-hush, classified information.

"But such information is often incomplete, may be less timely than open source materials, lacks important context and" says the study's author, Kenneth Liberthal, a former National; Security Council staffer in the Clinton White House, "is occasionally of dubious reliability."

In the world of intelligence analysts, he suggests, classified -- i.e., stolen -- information is like catnip.

They "tend to gravitate to information obtained by clandestine means. Yet much of that information lacks context and is substantively rather marginal," Lieberthal writes.

"As a consequence, analyses overly driven by classified sources may suffer from ignorance of important information in unclassified sources. This is especially notable with the explosion of unclassified material now available on key targets such as China."
In other words, the analysts should try reading newspapers.

Perhaps even worse, Lieberthal alleges, analysts "sometimes 'save[d]' useful information for PDB use," which sounds like the CIA's version of putting a shiny apple on the teacher's desk.
Saving some bits of information for the president's eyes only make sense sometimes, Lieberthal noted drily, but "withholding less sensitive information for hours or days so it appears first in the PDB is dangerous."

When Adm. Blair roots out behavior like all this, then we'll know the Director of National Intelligence is earning its money.

China urges U.S. to correct mistaken remarks in NIS report

(Analyst's note: I missed the point that China was on the distribution list for the NIS report issued Tuesday. The timeliness of their comment is "interesting" to say the least.)

Editor: Li Xianzhi

BEIJING, Sept. 16 (Xinhua) -- China on Wednesday urged the United States to correct its wrong opinions about China in its 2009 National Intelligence Strategy (NIS) report issued Tuesday.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu commented when answering a question about China's reaction to the report which listed China, Russia, Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) as the four major countries challenging the U.S. interests.

Jiang said China has always been a strong force in safeguarding and promoting world peace and stability, and China's development does not pose a threat to any other countries.

"We urge the United States to discard its Cold War mindset and prejudice, correct the mistakes in the NIS report and stop publishing wrong opinions about China which may mislead the American people and undermine the mutual trust between China and the United States," she said.

The NIS, produced by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, is also a four-year blueprint for all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies.

Not Top Secret: The National Intelligence Strategy



On its face, the National Intelligence Strategy document released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence this morning seems like a pro-forma exercise in accounting -- accounting for the dollars that Congress appropriates to the intelligence community, accounting for all the committees, processes, buzzwords and contracts. But in the hands of Adm. Dennis Blair, it is a document about priorities and about competing values. (Only in the United States does the intelligence community release its strategy -- albeit broadly -- and invite the media to ask questions.) Embargoed Document - 2009 NIS.pdf
There is a large classified annex to the NIS, but the public version tells us a lot about the Obama administration's national security strategy. There are six mission objectives. The first is to "combat violent extremism." Note the verbiage; the mission is not to combat "Islamic extremism" or "radical jihad." The change is critical -- it's been endorsed by everyone up to the president himself, who has been influenced heavily by the conviction of his chief counterterrorism adviser, John Brennan, that the way we label our priorities has an enormous effect on how we fight them. Mission two: Counter WMD proliferation. Makes sense -- but note that it is a separate entry from the need to combat violent extremism. The separation makes sense from the administration's perspective, because the first objective is not simply about offensive or defensive intelligence capabilities -- it's about integrating intelligence with all the instruments of foreign policy. Mission three is the traditional mission of the IC, the one that the National Security Act of 1947 established: provide strategic intelligence and warning. Mission four is obscure to the general public but vital to intelligence professionals -- integrate counterintelligence capabilities. The classified annex probably discusses the need for more offensive counterintelligence operations -- that is, the need to trick the enemy -- and to do so using all means available and all parts of the government.

The U.S.'s counterintelligence capabilities are very weak and largely limited to trying to ferret out spies and figure out the intelligence capabilities of foreign governments. Point five: "enhance cybersecurity." A new cyber security coordinator at the White House would be nice...no? And point six: "Support Current Operations (ongoing U.S. diplomatic, military, and law enforcement operations)." Current Operations is a euphemism for what the Bush Administration used to call the "Global War Against Terrorism."

The document itself focuses on integrated threats. Alongside references to the challenges posed by proliferation, by rogue nations, and by insurgencies are mentions of economic change, climate change, migrations, technological change, pandemics and global health and lone hackers.

Functionally, the intelligence community can't achieve its objectives unless it figures out how to play nicely with each other. Though there's been a noticeable shift in culture after 9/11 -- from "need to know" to "need to share" -- and numerous experiments with cross-agency collaboration and social media, the congressionally mandated structure of the community remains an acute and open wound -- as illustrated by the dispute between the CIA and Adm. Blair over chain of command, and the DNI's general lack of operational control over the agencies under the patronage of the Department of Defense.

Fears of double-dip recession as credit shrinks at Depression rate


(Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, London Telegraph) "There has been nothing like this in the USA since the 1930s," he said. "The rapid destruction of money balances is madness" ...

Both bank credit and the M3 money supply in the United States have been contracting at rates comparable to the onset of the Great Depression since early summer, raising fears of a double-dip recession in 2010 and a slide into debt-deflation. .... the Federal Reserve and other central banks will be forced to engage in outright monetisation of government debt by next year, whatever they say now.

(Analyst's note: This is very troubling)

Homeland Security Sharing Tool Helps Fusion Centers Fight Terror

from National Terror Alert Center

The Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and Defense (DoD) today announced an initiative to grant select state and major urban area fusion center personnel access to classified terrorism-related information residing in DoD’s classified network.

Under this initiative, select fusion center personnel with a federal security clearance will be able to access specific terrorism-related information resident on the DoD Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet)—a secure network used to send classified data. This classified data will be accessed via DHS’ Homeland Security Data Network (HSDN). DHS will be responsible for ensuring that proper security procedures are followed.

This initiative reflects the federal government’s strong commitment to improve information sharing with our state, local, and tribal partners,” said DHS Acting Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis Bart R. Johnson. “Fusion centers are a critical part of our national security enterprise, and this new tool enables federal agencies to share information with these partners while utilizing our advanced technical capabilities for secure information sharing.”

“With this action, DoD continues its work in supporting states and localities who are leading our efforts to secure the nation from domestic terrorism attacks, said Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas’ Security Affairs Paul N. Stockton. “We look forward to exploring other opportunities where DoD can help our state and local partners effectively defeat terrorism.”

This joint initiative will promote collaboration between DHS, DoD and other federal departments and agencies, enabling the trusted and secure exchange of terrorism-related information in order to detect, deter, prevent and respond to homeland security threats.

State and major urban area fusion centers provide critical links for information sharing between and across all levels of government, and help fulfill key recommendations of the 9/11 Commission. This initiative will serve as a valuable resource to enhance situational awaeness and support more timely and complete analysis of national security threats.

Increasing the breadth of law enforcement that have access to terrorism-related data will further improve the ability of fusion centers to prevent, detect, deter, and respond to terrorist attacks, and advance the combined missions of DHS and DoD to protect the nation’s security.

DHS and DoD remain committed to protecting privacy and civil liberties as well as data and networks in an increasingly vulnerable cyber environment.

First Observer – Truckers Learn To Watch Out For Terrorists

first_observer_truckers

By Rachel Raskin-Zrihen

A local truck driving school became the first on the West Coast to be trained for a new federal anti-terrorism program, the school’s owner and the instructor said. Robert Hertan, an instructor from Maryland-based Total Security Services International, Inc., led the three-hour class at Vallejo’s Falcon Truck School recently. He said the federal Transportation Security Administration hired his firm to train transportation professionals for the “First Observer” program.

This is a Department of Homeland Security program, funded by FEMA and administered by the TSA,” Hertan said.

The heart of the training is to use truckers to keep an eye out for — and report — suspicious behavior that could be part of a terrorist operation or some other attack like that on the state capitol eight years ago. ....

Airborne Laser Could Save Us From Terrorist Nightmare Scenario

(Analyst's note: This is absolutely must read item. Our on-going national security is significantly impacted by this technology.)

by W. Thomas Smith Jr.

Perhaps one of the most frightening terrorist-attack scenarios is one wherein a nuclear-tipped missile is launched by terrorists from a seemingly harmless cargo ship somewhere off the coast of the United States.

In such an attack, the missile could be hurtling skyward almost before our current missile-defense system had time to blink. The missile’s warhead could then be remotely detonated somewhere 20 to 60-plus miles above the visual horizon, and -- in addition to killing everyone in the blast and radiation radius -- trigger an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), which would basically fry every single electrical circuit in the blast’s line-of-sight for hundreds of miles in every direction. An EMP would effectively knock out all electrical grids, aircraft, trains, ships, automobiles, computers, medical equipment, ATM machines, cooling and heating systems, TVs, radios, telephones, blackberries, flashlights, electric toothbrushes, and children’s toys in an instant.

In less time than that required to take a breath, a huge section of North America would be catapulted back to the 18th century. Yet because we are so completely dependent upon 21st century technology, the ensuing chaos, crime, starvation, and disease would be something unimaginable.

A single enemy missile could do this to us.

The U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Missile Defense Agency, however, have an answer to this threat in the Airborne Laser (ABL) program, essentially a high-energy laser-beam system housed in a Boeing 747-400 aircraft. (Boeing is the primary ABL contractor. Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman are partners developing the laser-weapon system.)

The ABL system is designed to kill enemy ballistic-missiles -- short, medium, and long-range -- during the boost-phase portion of the missile’s flight, shortly after the missile has been launched. And being that the system is airborne, ABL is capable of patrolling the U.S. coastline as well as near-and-above “potential enemy ballistic-missile hotspots,” worldwide.

Amazingly, a plan to go forward with ABL was killed by the Obama administration in defense cuts this year (see Obama’s Pentagon Cuts). Yes, I know, developing the ABL is not cheap, and fielding these missile-zapping aircraft would run into the $ tens-of-billions. But writing in 1776, Adam Smith said that the first duty of government is national defense. Clearly, today the nation is involved in an asymmetrical war. The missile-threat dynamic (including the proliferation of missile and nuclear weapons technology) is clearly a part of that asymmetrical war. ABL is needed to counter the threat. Meanwhile, government-spending on modern public entitlement programs -- which have nothing to do with government’s “first duty” -- has run into the hundreds-of-billions of dollars for years.

At any rate, despite having “lost favor in Washington” -- which almost always favors entitlement programs over its “first duty” -- the ABL program is “still going strong at Edwards Air Force Base,” according to an article in CNET, with recent testing of “the beam’s power.”

So what does the ABL system look like and how does it work?

Basically, the forward half of the ABL aircraft contains the beam-control/fire-control system, “which [Boeing says] compares in size and sophistication to the Hubble Space Telescope,” Michael Rinn, a Boeing vice president and the program director for the ABL, tells HUMAN EVENTS.

The rear half of the aircraft contains -- what is billed as “the world’s largest mobile laser” -- a megawatt-class directed-energy weapon (Keep in mind, a megawatt is a million watts of energy) known as a “chemical iodine oxygen laser” or COIL.

In action, the ABL’s attack sequence is fourfold:

• Detect target
• Acquire and track target
• Compensate for atmospheric problems
• Kill missile

According to the Missile Defense Agency, the ABL initiates the attack by first, detecting -- with six infrared sensors -- “the exhaust plume of a boosting missile.

Once the missile is detected, a kilowatt-class (1,000 watts of energy) solid-state laser known as “a track illuminator” begins tracking the missile and determining a precise aiming point.

Then “a beacon illuminator” (also a 1,000-watt laser) begins measuring -- and correcting for -- atmospheric disturbances: The corrections are accomplished with the use of “adaptive optics,” which basically “point and focus” the big million-watt COIL at the intended target.

Finally, using a powerful telescope positioned in the 747’s nose turret, the system focuses the COIL beam onto the enemy missile and destroys it. The rotating turret enables the laser to attack the missile without the aircraft altering its course.

No other country has this directed-energy capability,” says Rinn, “The potential of megawatt-class, mobile, directed-energy airborne-platforms is enormous. Future potential multi-mission capabilities could change the way we fight wars and defend our friends and allies. Boeing is using internal investments to examine directed energy's potential to address several other critical missions, including defending against aircraft, cruise missiles and surface-to-air missiles.

So, would an operational ABL system actually be sufficient to knock down a sea-launched missile (a terrorist missile launched from a freighter close to our shores) in the EMP attack-scenario?

“Yes,” says Rinn. “Based on all tests performed by our prototype, an operational ABL would be able to track, acquire, and destroy an incoming ballistic missile. This weapon system is able to intercept ballistic missiles when they are most vulnerable and before they deploy decoys.

Additionally, ABL is capable of gathering intelligence on launch sites, and -- during ballistic-missile combat -- relay missile-trajectory information to other elements of America’s missile defense system.

ABL is described by Defense officials and military analysts as “unique” and “revolutionary.” Even its political detractors agree, ABL is unlike any weapon system ever deployed.

ABL is the pathfinder for directed energy weapons,” says Rinn, who adds the real warfighting game-changer in all of this lies in our “ability to defend ourselves -- and our friends and allies -- at the speed of light.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Tens of thousands? I think not!

by Jared Law

I don't think that any reasonable person would deny the fact that we had 1-2 MILLION Patriots at the March on Washington, D.C. on 9/12! Check out this video of photos+audio:


This is a pretty good video except for one thing: images 4 & 5 are from another event (one I would NOT promote, personally), but the video is great, except for that. I only wish they had used THIS TIME-LAPSE PHOTOGRAPHY VIDEO FROM THE 9/12 MARCH ON WASHINGTON INSTEAD:


EDIT: Thanks for catching that mistake, everybody! As you can see, the error has now been corrected. Thanks again!

Joe Wilson apologized. When will John Murtha?

.... Whether the motivations behind Murtha's treasonous actions were political (At the time, he was angling for the post of Majority Leader.) or personal...His actions were treasonous nonetheless, and unlike Rep. Joe Wilson, he has never apologized.John Murtha has never apologized to the Marines he betrayed nor to the soldiers he put in greater danger with his seditious words.

Queens terror raids part of FBI probe into Denver-based cell plotting attack on 9/11 scale

(Analyst's note: Clearly from this one must read article alone, you get the idea that we must continue to operate as if we are in a war -- we are in such!)

BY James Gordon Meek In Washington AND Rocco Parascandola AND Larry Mcshane

The massive FBI probe that triggered raids in Queens is focused on a Denver-based terror cell plotting another attack on the scale of 9/11, the Daily News learned Tuesday.

Hundreds of FBI agents are on the ground in Colorado, conducting round-the-clock surveillance on five suspects - including a man who recently visited Queens, sources told The News.

New York authorities searched three Flushing apartments and detained several men - later released - after getting a warrant to look for bomb-making components, explosive powders and fuses.

"The FBI is seriously spooked about these guys planning another 9/11," a former senior counterterrorism official told the News. "This is not some ... FBI informant-driven case. This is the real thing."

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly told reporters it's an ongoing investigation with plenty of "substance."

The 24-7 counterterror operation included Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants used to intercept calls and e-mails, as well as overseas-linked wiretaps to eavesdrop on Arabic and Pashto-speaking targets.

Sources said the investigation's targets are Afghans - an unusual development. Al Qaeda prefers Arabs and Pakistanis as there overseas operatives. ....

FBI and Homeland Security Warn NY Police Watch For Explosives Materials

US Cities, Fed. Unprepared For Recovery From Dirty Bomb

(Analyst's note: This is a troubling report.)

by Mickey McCarter

US cities would be so overwhelmed by a dirty bomb or nuclear bomb attack that they would invariably rely upon the federal government for recovery, but agencies like the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have not yet completed their planning for delivering such assistance, congressional investigators warned Monday.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) surveyed 13 major US cities and their states and related FEMA regional offices, discovering that each quickly would require assistance from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for analysis and cleanup activities, which would significantly mitigate the impact of a radiological dispersal device (RDD) or an improvised nuclear device (IND), Gene Aloise, GAO director of Natural Resources and Environment, testified before the House Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology.

“However, we found that the federal government has not sufficiently planned to undertake these activities,” Aloise stated. “For example, FEMA has not issued a national disaster recovery strategy or plans for RDD and IND incidents as required by law. Existing federal guidance provides only limited direction for federal agencies to develop their own recovery plans and conduct exercises to test preparedness. Out of over 70 RDD and IND exercises conducted in the last five years, only three have included interagency recovery discussions following a response exercise.” ....

Newest video ACORN confession: 'I shot him' Employee boasts of setting stage for self-defense killing

(Analyst's note: Absolutely must read - see.)

By Alyssa Farah

An ACORN worker in San Bernardino, Calif., says she assembled the groundwork for a case of self-defense, then picked up a gun and shot her former husband.

The statements by a woman identified as Tresa Kaelke at an ACORN office in California come in a new video released on Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com website.

The video is the latest in a series of revealing reports assembled by filmmaker James O'Keefe and associate Hannah Giles, who previously reported on visits to ACORN offices in several cities, including Baltimore, Brooklyn and Washington.

ACORN: A Brief History

from FoxNews

ACORN — the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now — bills itself as the nation's largest grassroots community organization of low- and moderate-income people, with more than 400,000 member families organized within 1,200 neighborhood chapters in 110 cities across the U.S. ....

VIDEO -- Beck -- It is NOT about ACORN

(Analyst's note: Absolutely must read - watch. Please click on both the title above & the URL below.)



Click here for Shocking 4th video

Taliban makes IEDs deadlier

The Taliban has been building simpler, cheaper anti-personnel bombs made of hard-to-detect nonmetal components, increasing the number of lethal attacks on NATO forces in Afghanistan, according to a confidential military report.

The shift in the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) away from larger anti-armor bombs has allowed the Taliban to produce more weapons and hide them in more places as they strive to kill larger numbers of American forces in southern Afghanistan's Helmand province and other contested regions.

The change in production from metal-dominated explosives to devices made of plastic is making it more difficult for ground troops to detect the buried IEDs with portable mine-detectors, creating an "urgent need" inside the Pentagon for better detection devices, the report said.

The new Taliban tactics are disclosed in a confidential report from the Pentagon's Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, portions of which were obtained by The Washington Times. ....

50 million new patients to spark doctor shortage?


(Associated Press) Among the many hurdles facing Obama's plan to revamp the nation's health care system is a shortage of primary care physicians ...

Revealed: The ghost fleet of the recession

(Analyst's note: This is a most troubling yet interesting report. Please click on the title above for additional information. Clearly all is NOT well in the world economy.)

The biggest and most secretive gathering of ships in maritime history lies at anchor east of Singapore. Never before photographed, it is bigger than the U.S. and British navies combined but has no crew, no cargo and no destination - and is why your Christmas stocking may be on the light side this year

The 'ghost fleet' near Singapore

The 'ghost fleet' near Singapore. The world's ship owners and government economists would prefer you not to see this symbol of the depths of the plague still crippling the world's economies

The tropical waters that lap the jungle shores of southern Malaysia could not be described as a paradisical shimmering turquoise. They are more of a dark, soupy green. They also carry a suspicious smell. Not that this is of any concern to the lone Indian face that has just peeped anxiously down at me from the rusting deck of a towering container ship; he is more disturbed by the fact that I may be a pirate, which, right now, on top of everything else, is the last thing he needs.

His appearance, in a peaked cap and uniform, seems rather odd; an officer without a crew. But there is something slightly odder about the vast distance between my jolly boat and his lofty position, which I can't immediately put my finger on.

Then I have it - his 750ft-long merchant vessel is standing absurdly high in the water. The low waves don't even bother the lowest mark on its Plimsoll line. It's the same with all the ships parked here, and there are a lot of them. Close to 500. An armada of freighters with no cargo, no crew, and without a destination between them.

.... Here, on a sleepy stretch of shoreline at the far end of Asia, is surely the biggest and most secretive gathering of ships in maritime history. Their numbers are equivalent to the entire British and American navies combined; their tonnage is far greater. Container ships, bulk carriers, oil tankers - all should be steaming fully laden between China, Britain, Europe and the US, stocking camera shops, PC Worlds and Argos depots ahead of the retail pandemonium of 2009. But their water has been stolen.

They are a powerful and tangible representation of the hurricanes that have been wrought by the global economic crisis; an iron curtain drawn along the coastline of the southern edge of Malaysia's rural Johor state, 50 miles east of Singapore harbour.

.... A couple of years ago these ships would be steaming back and forth. Now 12 per cent are doing nothing

You may wish to know this because, if ever you had an irrational desire to charter one, now would be the time. This time last year, an Aframax tanker capable of carrying 80,000 tons of cargo would cost £31,000 a day ($50,000). Now it is about £3,400 ($5,500).

This is why the chilliest financial winds anywhere in the City of London are to be found blowing through its 400-plus shipping brokers.

Between them, they manage about half of the world's chartering business. The bonuses are long gone. The last to feel the tail of the economic whiplash, they - and their insurers and lawyers - await a wave of redundancies and business failures in the next six months. Commerce is contracting, fleets rust away - yet new ship-builds ordered years ago are still coming on stream.

....'A couple of years ago those ships would have been steaming back and forth, going at full speed. But now you've got something like 12 per cent of the world's container ships doing nothing.'

Aframaxes are oil bearers. But the slump is industry-wide. The cost of sending a 40ft steel container of merchandise from China to the UK has fallen from £850 plus fuel charges last year to £180 this year. The cost of chartering an entire bulk freighter suitable for carrying raw materials has plunged even further, from close to £185,000 ($300,000) last summer to an incredible £6,100 ($10,000) earlier this year.

Business for bulk carriers has picked up slightly in recent months, largely because of China's rediscovered appetite for raw materials such as iron ore, says Huxley. But this is a small part of international trade, and the prospects for the container ships remain bleak.

.... The knock-on effect of so many ships sitting idle rather than moving consumer goods between Asia and Europe could become apparent in Britain in the months ahead.

'We will find out at Christmas whether there are enough PlayStations in the shops or not. There will certainly be fewer goods coming in to Britain during the run-up to Christmas.'

Three thousand miles north-east of the ghost fleet of Johor, the shipbuilding capital of the world rocks to an unpunctuated chorus of hammer-guns blasting rivets the size of dustbin lids into shining steel panels that are then lowered onto the decks of massive new vessels.

As the shipping industry teeters on the brink of collapse, the activity at boatyards like Mokpo and Ulsan in South Korea all looks like a sick joke. But the workers in these bustling shipyards, who teem around giant tankers and mega-vessels the length of several football pitches and capable of carrying 10,000 or more containers each, have no choice; they are trapped in a cruel time warp.

There have hardly been any new orders. In 2011 the shipyards will simply run out of ships to build

WHITE STUDENT BEATEN ON SCHOOL BUS; CROWD CHEERS

Intelligence Analyst Charged With Hacking Top Secret, Anti-Terror Program

By Kevin Poulsen

An analyst at a Defense Department spy satellite agency faces federal hacking charges after allegedly poking around in a top-secret system used in a classified terrorism investigation involving the FBI and the U.S. Army.

Brian Keith Montgomery worked on a covert program for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency — the spy agency in charge of satellite and aerial image collection. On April 9, he was carrying out his duties when he saw a message that “provided significant detail about a classified operation” that was unrelated to his job, according to an affidavit filed by a Pentagon investigator.

The operation is not detailed in the affidavit (.pdf), but there is a reference to the 902nd Military Intelligence Battalion, an Army counterintelligence unit based at Fort Meade in Maryland, with a presence at more than 50 other locations inside and outside the United States. The 902nd faced controversy in 2005, when NBC News published documents showing the the unit had been spying on American anti-war protesters. Under the guise of fighting terrorism, the group had filed intelligence reports on legal demonstrations, including a weekly protest at an Atlanta recruiting station, and a protest at the University of California at Santa Cruz.

According to the government, Montgomery ignored a security warning in the message he saw, and twice logged in to a classified system used in the terrorism investigation: first on April 9, when he stayed on for two hours, and then on April 14. He’d gotten the password from another classified message to which he also had legitimate access. ...

A letter From a Friend to Obama

Sir:

I was so happy to hear you say that you were going to see to it that
America is finally going to deal with the "excesses" that have gotten
us into so much fiscal difficulty, kudos to you!

I guess that you will start by cutting that ridiculously "excessive"
UN dues payment each year! One billion, two hundred-fifty million a
year, is a little steep to belong to a "club", where all of the other
members hate you, and you pay one third of the cost to run the thing!

Another good one, would be to roll back the Bush commitment of 15
billion dollars to fight AIDS in Africa, that is really "excessive",
when you consider the fact that no other country has contributed any
significant amount!

Thank God for ACORN! Now that they have been "exposed" and indicted,
that 8 billion dollars that you want to give them, certainly will be
"excessive" now!

Considering the fact that no other nation is willing to match our
contributions, you could squelch the pending legislation that is known
as the "Global Poverty Act", that will save another "excessive" 845
billion dollars!

How about the "Jubilee Act?" That one will cost the American
taxpayers another 58 billion dollars, time to kill that one too!

How about Nancy Pelosi's jet, and Charlie [Tax Man] Rangel's Cadillac
Escalade? Two Ford Focuses will do nicely there!

And, it is "excessive" to send billions of dollars in foreign aid
overseas every time there is an earthquake, mountain slide, or
Tsunami, cut there too!

Since you have all of those CZARs, you won't be needing the Congress,
after all, two governments does seem somewhat excessive! Send them
[Congress] home, and fire all of their staff support, and while you're
at it, confiscate their cars, and reduce their pensions to $20,000.00
annually! Let's see how long it takes the CZARS to show their
"excesses."

And, the most-powerful military in the world, now that would be a
good place to look for "excesses", like too many planes, too many
ships, too many troops; you get my gist!

And, what do we really need with a US Customs, or a US Border Patrol;
or an Office of Homeland Security for that matter, these are obviously
"excesses!" And, now that you are in place, do we really need a HEW,
or a HUD? Those savings are really adding up!


Tony Bellotte


NBC (the network that rigged crash tests, staged racism stings & faked flood coverage) criticizes ACORN “entrapment”

America as the last man standing

'In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe?'


(Analyst's note: Here is the absolutely must read speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem.)



Dear friends,

Thank you very much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.


First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.


The Europe you know is changing.

You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created byMuslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It's the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden
. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.

In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear 'whore, whore'. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.

In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In England Sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call 'respect'. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.


The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept Sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.


Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators 'settlers'. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies, they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored. I

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages - at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.


Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means 'submission'. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is Sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam 'the most retrograde force in the world', and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam's territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a 'right-wing extremists' or 'racists'. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America - as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe's children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.
Here is a link to a newspaper article about his December 2008 speech.

Saudi prince warns U.S. not to go 'green' Seeking 'mirage of independence' will result in 'disaster'

The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin

A prominent Saudi prince is warning the United States against trying to become energy independent, claiming it is "political posturing at its worst – a concept that is unrealistic, misguided, and ultimately harmful to energy-producing and consuming countries alike," according to a report from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.

Saudi Prince Turki al-Faisal, brother to Saudi King Abdullah Bin-Abd-al-Aziz Al Saud, claimed such a motto as "energy independence" is "code for arguing that the United States has a dangerous reliance on my country of Saudi Arabia."

A former chief of Saudi intelligence and ambassador to London and the U.S., Turki said that such an argument, in effect, blames Saudi Arabia for "everything from global terrorism to high gasoline prices."....

Audio -- Massive new bureaucracy to protect consumers? Financial analyst: Obama plans will crush 'ability of business to make a profit'

U.N. calls for replacement of U.S. dollar Joins Russia, China and G20 with demands IMF step forward

The following report is excerpted from Jerome Corsi's Red Alert

World organizations, including the United Nations, are openly calling for the creation of a one-world currency to replace the dollar – and the Obama administration's trillion-dollar deficits are serving as a trigger for the currency switch, Jerome Corsi's Red Alert reports.

A United Nations report recommended that a new one-world currency should be created to replace the dollar as the standard for foreign-exchange holdings in international trade

.

"If the plan succeeds, the United Nations would effectively end up replacing the United States as the issuer of the one-world international currency used as the standard of foreign exchange to settle international trade transactions," Corsi wrote. "The move would obviate the need for any nation state in the future to be the arbiter of world trade, marking yet another blow to national sovereignty on the path to one-world government."

The report, released by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, or UNCTAD, endorsed a proposal that Special Drawing Rights, or SDRs, issued by the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, "could be used to settle international payments."

Red Alert has previously reported that Russia and China championed the idea to use the IMF's Special Drawing Rights as a new international currency as a proposal that was adopted by the G-20 meeting held in London last April.

Corsi noted, "That G20 summit meeting took an important step toward creating a new one-world currency through the International Monetary Fund that is designed to replace the dollar as the world's foreign exchange reserve currency of choice."

Point 19 of the final communiqué from the G20 summit in London on April 2 stated, "We have agreed to support a general SDR which will inject $250 billion into the world economy and increase global liquidity," taking the first steps forward to implement China's proposal that Special Drawing Rights at the International Monetary Fund should be created as a foreign-exchange currency to replace the dollar.

The IMF created SDRs in 1969 to support the Bretton Woods fixed exchange-rate system.

"The international supply of two key reserve assetsgold and the U.S. dollarproved inadequate for supporting the expansion of world trade and financial development that was taking place," a document on the IMF website explains. "Therefore, the international community decided to create a new international reserve asset under the auspices of the IMF."

When the Bretton Woods fixed-rate system collapsed, major world currencies, including the dollar, shifted to a floating exchange-rate system where the price of the dollar and other major world currencies was created by trading on international currency exchanges. ....