(Compiler's note: A very interesting read - I recommend it to you. Click on the title above to get to the entire article.)
Source: A friend:
From: "Brig Gen R. Clements USAF ret"
The following article from FPRI provides much insight into just how complex ending the conflict in the Pacific was. It didn't end because we dropped two A-bombs or because the Russians marched through Manchuria and launched an amphibious invasion of the
This is the most complete, concise historical accounting I have seen on the subject.
Harold
Comment:
The Admiral and I have discussed this before. Truman never signed an order to drop the atomic bombs. The operational orders were put into play and signed by Gen Thomas C Handy.
While flying as pilot for BG Fred Irving, 8090th PACUSA Detach 20 AAF, I had an opportunity to talk with General Handy when he came up front and sat in the co pilots seat. We talked from Guam to
"H
"Roger 8546 you are number two following the C-54 on final"
"Roger, I have VIP on board"
Roger 8546 you are number two following the C-54 also with VIP. Follow the C-54 on landing and take next turnoff to the ramp behind the C-54. The C-54 taxied up to the ramp and unloaded a USO troop. I came up behind flying a red four star flag on the C-46F. They thought the general was on board the C-54. You have never seen such a switch of people in your life. I had 12 flag rank officers on board. General Handy and Admiral Pownall, thought it was funny.
bob
....Most Americans today are surprised to learn that in 1945 and for approximately two decades thereafter no significant controversy accompanied the use of atomic weapons to end the Pacific War. A broad national consensus formed around three basic premises: 1) the use of the weapons was justified; 2) the weapons ended the war; and 3) in at least a rough utilitarian sense, the use of the weapons was morally justified as saving more lives than they cost. ....
No comments:
Post a Comment