Saturday, December 27, 2008

CIA Obstruction Stopped FBI from Uncovering 9/11

by Jane with The Jawa Report

Lawrence Wright is the author of The Looming Towers. This excellent article in the New Yorker focuses on the failure of the CIA to coordinate with the FBI in the USS Cole investigation, which lead to a failure to uncover the plans for 9/11.

Outside the scope of the article is the fact that all the Yemenis mentioned (and a dozen not mentioned) are free in Yemen including those convicted in Yemen of the Cole bombing. The exceptions are Nasheri, "Khalled" bin Attash and others who are in Gitmo. These Yemenis were in the inner core of bin Laden's group. Mostly everyone at the Malaysia meeting, where both the Cole and 9/11 were planned, are dead or in jail except for the Yemenis who were in Yemeni custody.

Although they are given benign descriptions in the MSM (and by the leftards) like Abu Jindal "driver" or al-Quso "failed photographer", these are persons involved in large-scale lethal al-Qaeda attacks against the US: the embassies, the Cole and 9/11. Factoring in the passage of a few years and protestations of rehabilitiation, statistically they continue to have a high likelihood of recidivism.

The New Yorker article is certainly worth a read.

Eligibility remains focus of Supremes' conferences

from WorldNetDaily

A second conference has been posted on the docket for the U.S. Supreme Court over the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the White House, this one scheduled a week after Congress is to review the Electoral College vote tabulation.

The latest issue posted is a request for an injunction on the election results pending the resolution of a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by attorney Philip J. Berg, a case that is docketed for a similar conference among the justices on Jan. 9.

Berg's original case raises questions about Obama's eligibility and his injunction request first was filed early in December. It was submitted to and rejected by two different justices before it came before Justice Antonin Scalia on Dec. 18. Then just before Christmas the docket was updated to reflect that the motion had been "distributed for conference of January 16, 2009."

On Berg's Obama Crimes.org website, he said Congress is scheduled to hear the Electoral College results on Jan. 8. Then on Jan. 9 there's the conference scheduled on Berg's case itself, with the injunction issue to be addressed a week later.

WND has reported Berg's case, one of the first legal challenges to Obama's eligibility to reach the Supreme Court, alleges he cannot constitutionally be inaugurated.

"I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified natural born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of president of the United States," Berg said in a statement on his ObamaCrimes.com website.

"Obama knows he is not 'natural born' as he knows where he was born and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; Obama is an attorney, Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; Obama knows his candidacy is the largest 'hoax' attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; Obama places our Constitution in a 'crisis' situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world who know Obama is not qualified," Berg's statement continued.

"The Supreme Court has listed the case of Berg vs. Obama for 'conference' on January 9," the website said.

"I am appalled that the main stream media continues to ignore this issue as we are headed to a 'Constitution Crisis,'" Berg wrote. "There is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be enforced. I am concerned that our courts have not yet decided to look into the merits of our allegations."

WND previously reported on a case brought by Cort Wrotnowski. It fell by the wayside when the justices heard about it in conference but refused to give it a further hearing. That was the same fate handed to a case brought by Leo Donofrio. Both challenged Obama on essentially the same issue: allegations that dual citizenship based on a father who was a British subject and a mother who was an American minor disqualified him for office.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 190,000 others and sign up now!

The high court previously turned down a request from Berg to stop the Electoral College from selecting the 44th president until Obama documents his eligibility for the office.

As WND has reported, more than a dozen lawsuits have been filed over Obama's eligibility to assume the office of the president, many have been dismissed, while others remain pending.

The cases, in various ways, have alleged Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the legal challenges have alleged Obama was not born in Hawaii, as he insists, but in Kenya. Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. Such cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Several details of Obama's past have added twists to the question of his eligibility and citizenship, including his family's move to Indonesia when he was a child, his travel to Pakistan in the '80s when such travel was forbidden to American citizens and conflicting reports from Obama's family about his place of birth.

A partial listing and status update for several of the cases surrounding Obama's eligibility to serve as president is below:

  • Philip J. Berg, a Pennsylvania Democrat, demanded that the courts verify Obama's original birth certificate and other documents proving his American citizenship. Supreme Court conferences on the case and its motions are scheduled Jan. 9 and 16.

  • Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.

  • Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.

  • Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.

  • Chicago attorney Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital statistics record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.

  • Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.

  • In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.

  • In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.

  • In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injuction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.

  • California attorney Orly Taitz also has brought a complaint alleging Obama is not a "natural born" citizen and has written an open letter to the Supreme Court asking for the issue to be resolved.

Last month, WND reported the worries over a "constitutional crisis" that could be looming over the issue of Obama's citizenship.

"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void," argues the Alan Keyes case pending in California, "Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal."

With such high stakes potentially at risk, WND earlier launched a letter campaign to contact Electoral College members and urge them to review the controversy.

That followed a campaign that sent more than 60,000 letters by overnight delivery to the U.S. Supreme Court when one case contesting Obama's eligibility for the Oval Office was pending.

A separate petition, already signed by more than 190,000 also is ongoing asking authorities in the election to seek proof Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution.

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi had gone to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

The biggest question was why, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn't simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors. The image his campaign posted online has been rejected by critics since it is a "certification of live birth," not a birth certificate, and under Hawaii law at the time such certifications were given to parents of children born outside the state.

The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject. At one point a Kenyan ambassador said Obama's birthplace in Kenya already was being recognized.

Friday, December 26, 2008

U.S. Representatives Myrick and Wolf Write AIG

from ACT for America

On December 19, U.S. Representatives Sue Myrick and Frank Wolf sent a letter to Edward Liddy, Chairman of the Board and CEO of AIG, regarding AIG’s press release announcing its offering of Shariah-compliant insurance products.

Their letter comes on the heels of a lawsuit filed against Treasury Secretary Paulson and the Federal Reserve, which we reported to you last week.

Here is one sentence from the letter:
Since Americans are now de facto stockholders in your company, we feel it our duty to inform them that your press release ignores the fact that AIG is marketing products that support a radical political institution, Shariah law.”
Representatives Myrick (who is chairperson of the House Anti-Terrorism Caucus) and Wolf lay out in detail the problems with what AIG is doing due to its promotion of Shariah law, and close the letter by offering to set up a briefing for AIG by experts in this field.

Your calls and emails to AIG helped raise the awareness of this issue, and we contacted Rep. Myrick’s office a few days after AIG issued its press release. As we enter the New Year it will be revealing to see just how AIG and the Treasury Secretary respond.

But one thing’s for sure. It should be increasingly clear to Islamists, who are intent on subverting our country through such means as “jihad with money,” that we will not allow them to do so as they have done so successfully in countries like Great Britain.

To read the letter Representatives Myrick and Wolf sent, please click here.

Viagra helps CIA win friends in Afghanistan

Rezko attorney 'owns' Obama mansion

(Compiler's note: A look inside of Chicago politics ...)

By Jerome R. Corsi

An attorney for convicted fundraiser Tony Rezko is listed as the owner and taxpayer for Barack Obama's Chicago mansion, according to records obtained by WND.

William Miceli is a lawyer at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill & Galland, which also formerly employed Obama.

The controversy began when a website called News and Commentary for Thinking People published a 48-page document that lists Miceli as the owner of the Obama home at 5046 S. Greenwood.

Miner, Barnhill & Galland was Obama's employer when he did extensive legal work for Rezko, who awaits sentencing after he was convicted in June of fraud, money laundering and bribery-related counts.

Miceli, as a senior attorney at the firm, supervised Obama when the future president wrote letters on behalf of Rezko urging public authorities to award him new public properties to rehabilitate, notes the "Barack Book" website maintained by GOP.com.

WND asked for comment from Obama's transition team and the Democratic National Committee but did not receive a response.

Investigative reporter Tim Novak at the Chicago Sun-Times has identified 15 building projects that Rezmar, Rezko's development company, redeveloped while it was represented by Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland during Obama's time at the firm.

The law firm changed its name when senior partner Allison Davis left to join Rezko in his schemes to take out loans on low-income housing projects. Several of the transactions remain under investigation, because the millions of dollars Rezko borrowed against the properties to make redevelopments are gone, while many of the properties remain boarded up and uninhabitable.

Following the Jan. 21 Democratic Party primary debate, Miceli told the Washington Post that he was Obama's supervisor at the law firm, in response to Sen. Hillary Clinton's charges Obama had worked for a Chicago slumlord, Rezko.

The Post said "Obama denied doing any legal work directly for Rezko or his companies," contending Obama had done only "about five hours worth of work" on a joint real estate development project involving Rezko and a Chicago church group.

Miceli told the Post Obama "was a very junior lawyer at the time, who was given responsibility for basic due diligence, document review."

Miceli said Obama "did what he was told by the firm," minimizing the importance of any work Obama admittedly did for the Rezko account.

WND confirmed the tax bill for the Obama home is mailed to Miceli, not to Obama or the Northern Trust account through which Obama has claimed the home was purchased.

Records from the Cook County Treasurer's Office give the PIN number for the Obama property as 20-11-115-037-0000 and list Miceli as the person who receives Obama's property tax invoice by mail.

Eric Herman, a spokesman for the Cook County assessor, confirmed to WND that the Treasurer's Office records were correct and that Miceli did receive the Obama property tax invoice by mail.

Miceli did not return a call WND placed to him at Miner, Barnhill & Galland.

Herman told WND a second PIN number, 20-11-115-036-0000, identified the vacant lot next to the Obama mansion that was purchased by Rita Rezko, Tony Rezko's wife.

Here, WND found conflicts between the tax records maintained by the Cook County Treasurer's Office and the deed information maintained by the Cook County Recorder of Deeds.

Rosslyn Whitlock, an Internet support specialist at the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, confirmed to WND that the office has no information listed for the Obama home under the PIN number 20-11-115-037-0000, the number used by the Cook County Assessor's office for property tax purposes.

Records at the Cook County Recorder of Deeds list Rita Rezko as the holder of the warranty deed for the vacant lot at 5050 S. Greenwood adjoining the Obama mansion, under the PIN number 20-11-115-036-0000.

WND was able to locate warranty information at the Cook County Recorder of Deeds , which Herman at the County Assessor's office told WND was the "old PIN number" assigned to the Obama home at 5046 S. Greenwood Avenue, before the home was sold to Obama.

Neither spokesman could explain to WND the discrepancy in PIN numbers, nor why the Cook County Recorder of Deeds has no information filed under the new PIN number assigned to the property after the Obama purchase.

Records with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds under the PIN number 20-11-115-034-0000 indicate the mortgage is held by Northern Trust Company under trust number 10209, which Obama has indicated was the trust the Obama family used to purchase the home.

Meanwhile, WND has reported that since arresting Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald has taken new interest in Rezko's involvement in the Obama mansion purchase.

WND also reported real estate credit analyst Kenneth Conner has filed a civil suit alleging he was wrongfully dismissed by Mutual Bank of Harvey for objecting to what he considered a fraudulent appraisal of the vacant lot. The appraisal was submitted by the Rezkos at an intentionally high figure, he claims, permitting them to borrow an additional $125,000 that amounted to a "political payoff" to Obama.


Homeland Security forecasts 5-year terror threats

By EILEEN SULLIVAN

WASHINGTON (AP) - The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasing Internet savvy, says a new intelligence assessment obtained by The Associated Press.

Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear attacks are considered the most dangerous threats that could be carried out against the U.S. But those threats are also the most unlikely because it is so difficult for al-Qaida and similar groups to acquire the materials needed to carry out such plots, according to the internal Homeland Security Threat Assessment for the years 2008-2013.

The al-Qaida terrorist network continues to focus on U.S. attack targets vulnerable to massive economic losses, casualties and political "turmoil," the assessment said.

Earlier this month, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction remains "the highest priority at the federal level." Speaking to reporters on Dec. 3, Chertoff explained that more people, such as terrorists, will learn how to make dirty bombs, biological and chemical weapons. "The other side is going to continue to learn more about doing things," he said.

Marked "for official use only," the report does not specify its audience, but the assessments typically go to law enforcement, intelligence officials and the private sector. When determining threats, intelligence officials consider loss of life, economic and psychological consequences.

Intelligence officials also predict that in the next five years, terrorists will try to conduct a destructive biological attack. Officials are concerned about the possibility of infections to thousands of U.S. citizens, overwhelming regional health care systems.

There could also be dire economic impacts caused by workers' illnesses and deaths. Officials are most concerned about biological agents stolen from labs or other storage facilities, such as anthrax.

"The threat of terrorism and the threat of extremist ideologies has not abated," Chertoff said in his year-end address on Dec. 18. "This threat has not evaporated, and we can't turn the page on it."

These high-consequence threats are not the only kind of challenges that will confront the U.S. over the next five years.

Terrorists will continue to try to evade U.S. border security measures and place operatives inside the mainland to carry out attacks, the 38-page assessment said. It also said that they may pose as refugees or asylum seekers or try to exploit foreign travel channels such as the visa waiver program, which allows citizens of 34 countries to enter the U.S. without visas.

Long waits for immigration and more restrictive European refugee and asylum programs will cause more foreigners to try to enter the U.S. illegally. Increasing numbers of Iraqis are expected to migrate to the U.S. in the next five years; and refugees from Somalia and Sudan could increase because of conflicts in those countries, the assessment said.

Because there is a proposed cap of 12,000 refugees from Africa, officials expect more will try to enter the U.S. illegally as well. Officials predict the same scenario for refugees from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Intelligence officials predict the pool of radical Islamists within the U.S. will increase over the next five years due partly to the ease of online recruiting means. Officials foresee "a wave of young, self-identified Muslim 'terrorist wannabes' who aspire to carry out violent acts."

The U.S. has already seen some examples of these homegrown terrorists. Recently five Muslim immigrants were convicted of plotting to massacre U.S. soldiers at Fort Dix in a case the government said demonstrated its post-Sept. 11 determination to stop terrorist attacks in the planning stages.

The Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah does not have a known history of fomenting attacks inside the U.S., but that could change if there is some kind of "triggering" event, the Homeland assessment cautions.

A 2008 Interagency Intelligence Committee on Terrorism assessment said that Hezbollah members based in the U.S. do local fundraising through charity projects and criminal activity, like money laundering, smuggling, drug trafficking, fraud and extortion, according to the homeland security assessment.

In addition, the cyber terror threat is expected to increase over the next five years, as hacking tools become more sophisticated and available. "Youthful, Internet-savvy extremists might apply their online acumen to conduct cyber attacks rather than offer themselves up as operatives to conduct physical attacks," according to the assessment.

Currently, Islamic terrorists, including al-Qaida, would like to conduct cyber attacks, but they lack the capability to do so, the assessment said. The large-scale attacks that are on al-Qaida's wishlist - such as disrupting a major city's water or power systems - require sophisticated cyber capabilities that the terrorist group does not possess.

But al-Qaida has the capability to hire sophisticated hackers to carry out these kinds of attacks, the assessment said. And federal officials believe that in the next three to five years, al-Qaida could direct or inspire cyber attacks that target the U.S. economy.

Counterterrorism expert Frank Cilluffo says the typical cyber attack would not achieve al-Qaida's main goal of inflicting mass devastation with its resulting widespread media coverage. However, al-Qaida is likely to continue to rely on the Internet to spread its message, said Cilluffo, who runs the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington University.

Officials also predict that domestic terrorists in the forms of radical animal rights and environmental extremists will become more adept with explosives and increase their use of arson attacks.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Joy to Everyone this Christmas



Merry Christmas 2008!

The story this week isn't breaking news even though it's good news. In fact, old or new don't really apply—it's timeless. I hope you'll have a quiet moment to relax and listen to The Christmas Story read from the New Testament, interwoven with some of my favorite Christmas music.

Simple, short, and sweet.

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Carter laments: Terrorists lack 'defense' against Israel

ACORN, Soros Linked to Franken Vote Grab

FBI diverts anti-terror agents to Bernard Madoff $50 billion swindle

The FBI has been forced to transfer agents from its counter-terrorism divisions to work on Bernard Madoff’s alleged $50 billion fraud scheme as victims of the biggest scam in the world continue to emerge. .... It is understood that the US authorities believe it would have been impossible for the financier to have sustained a fraud of such magnitude over a number of years without significant assistance.....

Bush pardons drug dealers, not border agents, war hero

Inauguration Day Crowd Estimate Cut by Half

... D.C. authorities said the earlier estimates, provided by Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D), were based on speculation surrounding the historic nature of the swearing-in of Barack Obama as the nation's first African American president. After weeks of checking with charter bus companies, airlines and other sources, they're reassessing.....

Obama Administration wants Bush war team to stick around for smooth transition

from NetIndia123

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates, who has been named to the same Cabinet post by the incoming President-elect Barack Obama's Administration, has asked experienced members of the Bush war team to stick around to smooth the transition process in the Pentagon.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has asked most Bush Administration political appointees except those targeted for dismissal to stay on in the Pentagon until replaced by the Obama Administration in the coming months, The Washington Times reported.

"I have received authorization from the president-elect's transition team to extend a number of Department of Defense political appointees an invitation to voluntarily remain in their current positions until replaced," Gates said.

The chance to stay is "available to all willing political appointees with the exception of those who are contacted individually and told otherwise," he stated in an e-mail on December 19.

Notification of those who must depart was to be done before the close of business Monday. The identity of the dismissed officials could not be learned, the paper said.

The policy affects some 250 political appointees in the department. Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England and Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Eric Edelman have already announced that they plan to depart by January 20.

Two senior officials expected to stay are John Young, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, and James R. Clapper, the undersecretary of defense for intelligence.

About 40 positions in the Pentagon require Senate confirmation, including the undersecretaries and assistant secretaries and some deputies. The rest do not require a formal presidential nomination and Senate approval and can be made by the defense secretary, The Washington Times reported.

Geoff Morrell, Pentagon press secretary, confirmed that Gates wants to retain most political appointees. He said the policy of keeping so many holdover officials is unusual for a transition from a Republican to Democratic administration. (ANI)

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Altruism Comes with Penalty – When Good Turns Into Evil

by Susanne M. Reyto

There is such an increase of interfaith dialogue in our community lately, that it raises some concerns. While it is important to keep the doors open for dialogue, it is imperative to know who you are dialoguing with. Freedom of religion in the United States allows Islamists to encourage interfaith dialogue but in their countries there is no such freedom. Many Muslim leaders project peace and love, but beneath that is an agenda of ingratiating themselves to the American community to obtain acceptance and support for their mission.

The enormous positive response to and subsequent discussions after my recent article, “Interfaith Dialogue – Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism,” made me realize how tragically uninformed or misinformed our community leaders are.The mere fact of equating Islamophobia with Anti-Semitism is dangerous and comparing Islam with Judeo-Christian beliefs is ignorant. There are many fundamental differences. The most important one is that Judaism and Christianity do not want to kill those who believe differently than they do. Sadly, facts and consequences seem to elude our religious and political leaders.
I have always held rabbis, priests, pastors, etc. in high esteem and to a higher standard. I have come to realize that we cannot just blindly listen to them – we must hold them accountable and responsible, particularly because they are teaching our impressionable children. We need to become more knowledgeable, be prepared to debate matters and not follow blindly like a herd of sheep.
I have been a great supporter and active participant in community dialogues bringing together various religions and cultures. However, these gatherings must be conducted with ground rules, parameters and honesty from both sides, assuring that community outreach does not become community demise.
Christianity and Judaism command us to reach out to our neighbors but this spiritual outreach can only work with those who share our same basic beliefs. The Jewish community reaches out to help where aid is needed – locally or in distant lands like Darfur--seeking better understanding and working together for the common good.
The Muslim community’s purpose for outreach is to help itself, to diffuse the West, gain acceptance, tolerance and support for their goals and mission. The leaders try to convince their followers that they are victims of civil rights violations in the United States, and urge them to fight back. So far, we have given in to demands for religious observance at the work place, footbaths in public places, segregated swimming pools and gyms, halal food for cafeterias at schools and universities. There are honor killings in the United States and those communities want Sharia to supersede our laws. Sharia – Islamic law amongst other things oppresses women, calls for Jihad against infidels and is not compatible with our Constitution.
Suing companies seems to be prevalent, whereby they demand financial awards and workplace accommodations. The Swift plant in Colorado was sued recently because the company didn’t grant the demands of the Somali Muslim employees for time off to observe their holiday at the expense of other employees. Another company in Minnesota, Gold’n Plump Inc, had similar problems with Somali workers who ended up winning a court settlement to the tunes of $360,000. Qur’an:9:123 “Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you.”
According to Dr. Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum, Omar Ahmad, the long-serving chairman of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR, reportedly told a crowd of California Muslims in July 1998, “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran ... should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”
Lest we forget, Islam is not only a religion and a political ideology, but a complete system of life, dangerous to our Western existence.
Another expert, Professor Moshe Sharon, professor of Islamic studies at Hebrew University, Jerusalem, wrote in a major article, “Islam was born with the idea that it should rule the world.” Koran 9:33: "Allah sent Mohammed with the true religion so that it should rule over all the religions." Qur’an:8:39 “So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).
In spite of the Muslim leaders’ and imams’ rhetoric of preaching love and tolerance in our country, they go to great lengths to infiltrate and proselytize, to ‘take over the world.’ Islam teaches, to be kind to your own, all others are infidels and they should not be your friends. Koran 4:139: “Threat to those who take unbelievers (Jews and Christians) as friends. Allah does not accept other faiths.” According to the Koran, infidels are given three choices: convert, submit or die. Koran:9:29 “Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender,…
This is part of Islamic jihad. Koran 9:38-39 says, “Duty to participate and engage in Jihad is stressed.” Therefore, we must confront jihad, whether it is the violent form, or stealth jihad which is not so obvious but is creeping into our society.
One example, Sharia banking and financing are systematically changing our accepted financial structure but we are completely unaware of its consequences. Islamic banking is problematic because instead of U.S. laws and regulators, Muslim clerics make the laws. It is important to note that the origins of Islamic banking trace back to the 1920s, the Muslim Brotherhood and its founder, Hassan al-Banna.Another troubling area is where AIG, the insurance giant, is promoting Shariah-compliant insurance products. Sharia compliant institutions pose a major concern because typically they donate 2.5%of profits to charity which ultimately may end up in the coffers of radical terrorist organizations like Hamas.
We all must wake up to the sad realization that Islam simply is not compatible with Judeo-Christian beliefs. We, Americans are a tolerant people. It is the radicals’ deeds, threats, publicly declared wars, beheadings, fatwas, mistreatment of women and their violent reactions to criticism are the reasons for our hostility and fears. Despite this we should and we do extend ourselves spiritually, but practically, we do need to protect ourselves. Knowing their goals, we must be on guard. By the time we find our neighbor to be our enemy, it may be too late.
Years ago, immigrants enriched our melting pot society but today Muslim immigrants want to control it by imposing their customs. We went from enrichment to encroachment and soon, we will be controlled by such demands.
Colleges offer an ever growing number of courses in Islamic studies and Muslim professors seize the opportunity to counsel their impressionable students about the virtues of Islam. Slowly but systematically many end up converting and becoming our enemy, like Adam Gadahn from Orange County, Califorinia, who became a terrorist and al Qaeda’s spokesman.
It is a well known fact that by practicing “taqiyya” (Islamic doctrine permitting to lie or cheat to non-Muslims as long as it advances the cause) many Muslims say one thing to the West and another story to their own people. After the Mumbai massacre, while Iranian president Ahmadinejad sent a message of condolence to the Indian president and prime minister, Hamas and Al-Jazeera Internet Sites posted congratulatory, encouraging and inciting messages for further terrorism, specifically directing such acts of violence at Israel and the United States:
“Allah, sow terror and destruction in all the infidel countries. Best wishes to the heroic jihad fighters everywhere.”
The killing of a Jewish rabbi and his wife in the Jewish center in Mumbai is heartwarming news .”
Adding to this insanity, Qatar 's Al-Jazeera TV , the most popular channel in the Arab-Muslim world referred to the attackers not as terrorists, but as “armed men.” Until we call them terrorists and name the enemy, we cannot find a solution to the problem.
How is it possible that none of the Muslim leaders in the U.S. or elsewhere condemned these actions or comments? If the Muslim community protests the publishing of the Danish cartoons, why don’t they protest the atrocities in Mumbai or the past tragedies in London and Madrid? How can we dialogue with these people unless they renounce violence and jihad?
It is not the Muslims we need to be afraid of. It is Islam in its most violent form – unforgiving, militant, aggressive, intolerant and aiming to rule the world. Words and declarations don’t mean much. The West promotes tolerance and respect for all religions, whereas Islam teaches tolerance and respect only for Islam. Qu’ran 48:29 says: “Those who follow Mohammed are ruthless to the unbelievers but compassionate to one another.”
Rabbi Marc Schneier of the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding, co-creator of the “Twinning Program,” the Jewish Muslim Interfaith Dialogue, urged Jews to reclaim some of the passion they invested in the civil rights struggles of the 1950s and 1960s. A similar outreach to Muslims “can serve as a paradigm for Europe,” and perhaps even for the Middle East. Doesn’t he see the problems occurring in Europe? One of the responders to my article wrote that we must educate the American public about the danger of political correctness and the difference between racism and fighting an enemy. Many people in France and Holland are leaving their homes, families, businesses because of the increased hatred of Muslims towards Jews despite the many dialogue projects.
Moderate Muslims here in the U.S. have the freedom and duty to speak out but we hear from only a handful. If moderate voices don’t cry out and fight radicals, how can the West fight this ideology? Mark Steyn, the author/columnist says, “Silence equals Acceptance.”
Rabbis, political leaders, recognize this problem with Islam and do not be misled by empty words. What will it take for you to wake up?

Is the U.S. Government Getting Sucked Into Shariah-Compliant Finance?

by Frank Gaffney, Jr.

The insurance giant AIG has lately become the poster child for corporate risk-taking, mismanagement and greed. Its unimaginably large losses, rooted in insurance it extended to financial companies engaged in subprime mortgage-backed transactions, have destroyed both AIG's corporate reputation and balance sheet.

Indeed, but for the fact that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson – who during his days running Goldman Sachs had extensive ties to AIG – deemed the insurance firm "too large to fail," the company would surely have gone under by now. Instead, Mr. Paulson gave AIG well over $40 billion of the slush-fund Congress intended to bailout the financial sector (part of a total $150 billion the U.S. has sunk in AIG to date). As a result, you and I and our fellow taxpayers have been saddled with ownership of nearly 80% of this once high-flying and now-floundering global insurance enterprise.
Another result of AIG's nationalization is, if anything, even more worrisome.
It turns out that AIG has a subsidiary specializing in "takaful" – insurance products that are purportedly "Shariah-compliant." I say purportedly because – while they have been cynically deemed "pure" (halal) by Shariah advisers that AIG employed for the purpose of making such certifications – the Islamic code expressly prohibits business transactions that involve risk. Consequently, insurance products designed to hedge against risk are inherently "impure" or haram.
Whatever the status of AIG's "takaful" products under Islamic law, the U.S. government now has a vested interest in their financial success. Uncle Sam has become Uncle Shariah.
In so doing, Henry Paulson has acted in a manner that not only appears to smack of a conflict of interest and egregious disregard for the public's fiduciary interests. He also seems to have violated the Constitution.
The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights has long been interpreted as prohibiting the establishment of any national religion or conferring upon one religion a preference over others. By taking a massive stake in a company that explicitly promotes Islam's Shariah law, the U.S. government is acting at odds with both of these revered principles.
Fortunately, an important legal initiative has just been launched aimed at blocking Mr. Paulson and the Federal Reserve Board from engaging in this sort of unconstitutional behavior via Shariah-Compliant Finance (SCF) and other commercial transactions. A lawsuit filed December 15th in U.S. district court in Michigan by an Iraq war veteran named Kevin Murray contends that:
"The Shariah-based Islamic religious practices and activities that the government-owned AIG engages in – activities that are funded and financially supported by American taxpayers, including Plaintiff, who is forced to contribute to them – are antithetical to our Nation's values, customs, and traditions with regard to religious liberty, religious tolerance, and the proscriptions of the First Amendment. These government-funded activities not only convey a message of disfavor of and hostility toward Christians, Jews, and those who do not follow or abide by Islamic law based on the Quran or the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed, but they also embody actual commercial practices which are pervasively sectarian and which disfavor Christians, Jews, and other 'infidels,' including Americans."
The litigation seeks relief in ways that would be far-reaching at a time when the U.S. government has bought not only most of AIG but owns some 20 other financial institutions – and seems intent on encouraging their embrace of Shariah-Compliant Finance. (Notably, in November, Mr. Paulson's fellow Goldman Sachs alumnus and point-man for the financial sector bailout, Assistant Treasury Secretary Neel Kashkari, convened an "Islamic Finance 101" seminar where officials in the "policy community" were propagandized by Harvard University professors and other champions of the SCF industry.)
The court is being asked to rule that, among other things, the defendants' "policy and practice of approving, endorsing, promoting, funding, and supporting Shariah-compliant finance" and "the United States government's ownership interest in and use of taxpayer money to financially support AIG and its Takaful Insurance business, which is pervasively sectarian, violate the Establishment Clause."In addition, Murray v. Paulson seeks a permanent injunction against such practices both with respect to AIG and Shariah-Compliant Finance more generally.
Most Americans remain unaware of the menace posed by Shariah, let alone the extent to which it is being insinuated stealthily into our country. Happily, the latter is the subject of an excellent new book by the acclaimed scholar of Islam, Robert Spencer, entitled, Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam is Subverting America Without Guns or Bombs.
Murray v. Paulson therefore provides not just an opportunity for an urgently needed constitutional ruling and injunctive relief with respect to the U.S. government's submission to Shariah. This lawsuit brought on Mr. Murray's behalf by one of the nation's preeminent public interest law firms, the Thomas More Law Center, and by the formidable litigator/Shariah expert David Yerushalmi, who also serves as the Center for Security Policy's general counsel, affords the American people a vital teaching moment: Official promotion of Shariah law is unconstitutional and, given Shariah's inherently seditious nature (it explicitly requires the violent overthrow of all non-Islamic governments in favor of a global theocracy), acquiescence to its insinuation in this country constitutes a felony offense known as "misprision of treason."
We cannot tolerate and must not permit Uncle Sam's morphing into Uncle Shariah. Prompt action by the courts on Murray v. Paulson may spare us that monstrous transformation.

KSM ‘Mystifies’ GITMO General

by Clare M. Lopez

Fox News ran a story on December 16, 2008 about Guantanamo Bay that featured an interview with Army Brig. Gen. Gregory Zanetti, the deputy commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo since February 2008. Gen. Zanetti, a West Point graduate who holds advanced degrees from Boston University and a master’s degree in strategic studies from the Army War College, is a professional money management expert in civilian life. So, while it is understandable that many things about this National Guard general’s first overseas deployment might have been new and different to him, the ideology of the prison’s high profile Muslim inmates should not have been one of them. And yet, for this highly educated, superb professional soldier, the reality that al Qaeda’s top commanders are in fact devout Muslims seems to have left him completely perplexed. That this level of our national leadership in the War Against Islamic Jihad does not yet grasp the fundamental nature of the enemy threat deployed against us is, in its way, even more terrifying than what that enemy wants to do to us.

It was on a recent tour of the Guantanamo Bay maximum security cells that General Zanetti took the opportunity to talk to the Fox News reporter about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the al Qaeda master planner of 9/11 and perhaps the best-known of Gitmo’s notorious inmates. The General said that KSM, as he is known, “wants to die – he wants to be a martyr for the cause.” He showed the reporter the arrow provided for maximum security cells that points towards Mecca so the Muslim prisoners know which way to orient themselves for prayer.
What Gen. Zanetti said next, though, betrayed his utter confusion about the terrorists under his guard. He said that KSM prays for hours on end in his cell – and then he blurted, “What God are you praying to? What are you thinking, what is going on up there?”
In 1998, Osama bin Laden (UBL), Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and a loose-knit association of Bangladeshi, Egyptian, and Pakistani terrorist groups (including Lashkar-e Toiba) who termed themselves the International Islamic Front Against Jews and Crusaders declared war on the United States, Jews and the State of Israel, and liberal democracy everywhere. Attacks on our Embassies in East Africa, the USS Cole, and eventually the American homeland followed. Since 9/11, Islamic Jihadis have struck in Baghdad, Bali, Glasgow, Jerusalem, Kabul, Madrid, London, Mumbai, Thailand, and elsewhere. Countless manifestos from these killer Jihadis leave no doubt about why they do what they do: they believe that Allah and the example of the Prophet Mohammed command them to fight until “religion be only for Allah.” (Q 2:193) The very excellent Middle East Media and Research Institute (MEMRI) issues a steady stream of translated fatwas, Friday sermons, and TV interviews with leading Islamic scholars that all attest to the Islamic belief system with voluminous citations from Islamic doctrine, law, and scriptures, the hadith, and scholarly consensus and interpretation.
The fact that KSM is a U.S. university-educated professional with a degree in mechanical engineering seems not to have diminished his hatred of all things Western in the slightest, but rather actually contributed to his ability to plan the Twin Towers attack. In this, his experience is not unlike that of his Muslim Brotherhood predecessor, Sayyid Qutb, who studied at the Colorado State Teachers College in Greeley between 1948-50 but came away from that exposure to the values of the heartland appalled, horrified, and full of visceral loathing for the American way of life. Qutb’s written works, including In the Shade of the Qur’an and Milestones, remain classics of Islamic Jihadist ideology to this day.
Well might Gen. Zanetti puzzle at how this could possibly be. As a military professional with constitutional responsibility to command the front lines of the U.S.’s war with Islamic Jihad, though, he is required to know how educated professionals (including medical doctors such as al Qa’eda’s second-in-command, Ayman al-Zawahiri) can yet place their allegiance to Islam above all considerations for human dignity, individual liberty, or pluralistic tolerance. The reason, as anyone who does his homework with the Islamic texts would know, is that these concepts are Western concepts, born of a civic, philosophical, and theological tradition out of Athens, Jerusalem, and Rome. They have nothing whatsoever to do with the Islam of such as KSM or UBL.
That Islam, the Islam of Jihad against all unbelievers, is nonetheless sacred to its adherents. The mindset of a KSM was formed from childhood in the unshakeable belief that Islam and Muslims are truly and morally superior to all other people and faiths. Islamic supremacism holds that Allah commands the subjugation of all the world to Islam and that Paradise awaits those who follow his orders. This is not a devotion that would be easily recognizable to Gen. Zanetti – and yet he is bound by his oath of service to comprehend it. Because if he does not, then he cannot effectively confront and defeat either the enmity or the strategy of those like his prisoner KSM who would convert, subjugate, or kill us all.

A text message will be sent to 20,000 families living near a nuclear facility in the event of a radioactive disaster or emergency.

A deal was signed by two U.S. government agencies Wednesday to conduct new research on the effects of a dirty-bomb explosion in the United States. ....

You are here: 1. Home 2. News 3. News Topics 4. Politics 5. Defence Families to be warned by text message in the event of a n

from England

A text message will be sent to 20,000 families living near a nuclear facility in the event of a radioactive disaster or emergency.....

Bioterrorism Threat Reappears

DR. DOUG HANSON

It's been a while since we have heard much about it, but, bioterrorism has once aging reared it ugly head. On December 3rd the Commission on Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism released its report: World at Risk. While the report deals a lot with the threat of a nuclear attack it also presents the conclusions of the expert panel on the threat of a bioterrorism attack on U.S. soil. The major conclusion of the study is that the World faces the likelihood of a bioterrorist attack sometime between now and the year 2013. It is quite likely that such an attack would occur somewhere in this country or at a U.S. facility in some other country.

The recent episode of letters sent thru the mail with white powder in them reaffirmed how easy such an attack might be carried out. While these envelopes were a hoax the episode in 2001 where envelopes laced with anthrax were sent to various Congressman and news commentators demonstrates that a biological agent can be transmitted in a relatively unsophisticated manner.

We think of biological warfare as something that the military carries out with organisms genetically groomed to do a specific, deadly job. These organisms are combined with a very sophisticated system for delivery a process called weaponization. Indeed, the U.S. Military, and the militaries of many countries, have had programs to develop biological weapons. The U.S. Military presumably abandoned it program in 1969 because these weapons were too hard to handle and deliver safely. However, for a terrorist group like Al-Qaeda or others personal safety is not necessarily a major issue.

Anthrax:
The U.S. Government has focused a great deal of time and money on developing a defense system against an attack using the bacteria, Bacillus anthracis. Training programs for medical personnel and first responders have stressed how to recognize and treat anthrax infections. The Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) of Drugs (mainly Cipro) and other medical supplies for an anthrax attack is maintained at the CDC in Atlanta, GA. It is set up to be able to deliver drugs and supplies to any state in the country within 12 hours of an attack. The problem with this program is that an attack might not come from anthrax but from any one of a number of other organisms listed on the CDC's rostrum of Potential Bioterrorism organisms. These include organisms producing diseases like Plague, Tularemia, hemorrhagic fever, Brucellosis, Psittacosis and others. The bacteria and viruses causing these diseases vary widely in species and properties.

But What If It's Not Anthrax?
With so much emphasis placed on anthrax it is not unlikely that a terrorism group would choose to develop one of these other agents to use in an attack. The problem with any biological attack is that unlike a suicide bomber or car bomb the effects of the attack will not be apparent for some period of time after the initial events. This period called the incubation period can be as short as 24 hours or as long as a week to 10 days depending on the organism and the route of exposure. The most likely route of exposure would be by inhalation of an aerosol of the organism.

So unless there is an eye witness to someone releasing a biological agent the results would not become evident until large numbers of people begin showing up at hospital ERs or walk-in clinics exhibiting the signs of some unusual infection. One positive result of the Development of the Office of Homeland Security is an initiative that has lead to better reporting between hospitals of the occurrence of unusual cases. This will lead to a quicker realization that something unusual has occurred. For many of the potential biological agents the initial symptoms are hard to distinguish from other more common conditions like the flu. This can add one or more days until a definite diagnosis of and agent infection might occur. The exceptions are diseases like those caused by RNA viruses like the viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) viruses. In these cases the patient often shows sign of bleeding under the skin or from body orifices at very early stages.

Home Grown Bugs
It is widely believed that production of biological agents requires very sophisticated equipment and expertise to develop. While this is true if you want to develop military grade, weaponized material it is not quite so true if you simply want to develop some material that can be delivered to and kill a large number of people. Terrorist would rarely be too concerned about the purity of a culture used for a biological attack if they were to initiate one. After all, the suicide bomber rarely dress up in their best Sunday suit and tie (or more likely Thobe or Jibab) and goes out to bomb a market.

Any facility that has the means to grow a bacterial organism could be capable of growing a biological agent. This could include an abandoned bakery, a brewery including a small micro-brewery, pharmaceutical or biotechnology company, and many food processing plants. You simply need a means to culture a large quantity of the organism in some type of metal chamber that can be kept relatively sterile while the temperature and aeration process can be controlled. Once the large volume of culture is grown you simply need a way to concentrate it and then a delivery system that will produce an aerosol.

Delivering the Goods
A crude aerosol spray could be delivered into the air conditioning system of an office building or a large shopping mall or even released at some sporting or entertainment event where a large group of people are assembled. Once infected these individual would not show symptoms until the incubation period was complete. In the mean time they would have left the site of exposure and traveled to their homes in different parts of the city or different surrounding town. There if the biological agent was capable of being transmitted to others they might spread the disease to other members of their family, friends or even people at a drug store or local super market.

Mass Panic
When it is realized that a biological attack has taken place either by official announcement or more likely by a leak to the press it is likely that there will be a wide spread panic on the part of the public. While police will have to work with other responders to ensure any potential attack site is secure law enforcements biggest problem will be with crowd control. As news account of the attack spread across the city potentially thousands of people will descend on hospitals all believing they have been exposed. As they try to get medical help and antibiotics the hospitals and clinics will be overwhelmed. Fights will break out in crowds and pharmacies and even veterinary hospitals will be broken into as people attempt to get antibiotics.

For the first several days it may not be possible to determine who is actually infected and who is not. Everyone will believe that they have been exposed and this can lead to mass hysteria. In the 1995 Sarin chemical agent attack on a Tokyo subway over five thousand people descended on medical facilities claiming to have been exposed. In reality, only twelve people died and about five hundred suffered some non-lasting affects from the attack. Keeping order in a mass situation like this will be a daunting task for law enforcement officers.

US cybersecurity defences fail to thwart mock cyberattack

Critical US electronic systems have failed to withstand a simulated cyberattack. Participants in a recent cyber-warfare exercise told Reuters that the exercise highlighted problems in leadership, communications and readiness. The two-day exercise brought together 230 government agencies, private firms and other participants. Participants were split into two groups - attackers and defenders - before each developed tactics for attacking and defending critical infrastructure systems, such as those controlling banking, telecommunications and utilities.....

Five found guilty of plotting to kill Fort Dix soldiers

A jury has found five men guilty of conspiring to kill soldiers at Fort Dix, New Jersey, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office said Monday.....

Survey: Workers facing layoffs could be security threat

Fifty eight percent of Wall Street office workers surveyed say they would take valuable company data with them if faced with a layoff, if they knew could get away with it. The survey on the recession and its effects on work ethics was conducted among 226 office workers on New York Citys Wall Street by IT security firm Cyber-Ark. ....

Bomb case highlights FBI with new priorities

By BRENDAN J. LYONS

ALBANY — Before 9/11, information that young men were making large homemade firecrackers might have resulted in a knock on their door and a clunk on the head from a town cop telling them to cut it out.

But since Sept. 11, 2001, things have changed drastically, and a refocused FBI was never more evident than in a recent counterterrorism case that ensnared three Capital Region men on charges of making and trafficking in "destructive devices."

The investigation broke open on Dec. 5 when the men were arrested in a federal anti-terrorism task force raid of several homes in Watervliet and Troy. Police seized mail-order chemicals and materials used to make explosives, cannon fuses, rifles, BBs, a computer and a small amount of marijuana.

News coverage trumpeted the arrests, and at least one local television station reported the suspects had been charged with "terrorist acts," which was false.

The three-month investigation was headed by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force in Albany. Its intensive probe of the bomb-making tip appeared to cut no corners, using several agents for surveillance, telephone wiretaps and a carefully planned strategy to see how far the group would go.

Still, there are no terrorism allegations and no proof the suspects — Aaron A. Scorsone, Jonathan D. Plunkett and Scott A. Monroe, all in their 20s — intended to harm anyone, destroy property or attack the government.

For its part, the FBI contends it may be criticized for proactive investigations that involve informants nudging suspects to engage in crimes, but agents would be faulted if they ignored a lead and someone ended up dead or injured or the participants were later tied to terrorist acts.

"It is the FBI's obligation to investigate any potential act of terrorism in a timely fashion. Whether it is al-Qaeda or individuals with potential domestic terrorism intentions, the citizens of our country demand that the FBI dedicate the appropriate resources to address terrorism matters," Special Agent Paul Holstein, chief division counsel in the FBI's Albany office, said in a prepared statement. "In this particular investigation, the NYPD Intelligence Division obtained information from a cooperating witness that individuals were looking to sell bombs in exchange for money. ... This was a proactive investigation in which the threat was neutralized before an incident could occur."

Before their arrests, Plunkett had two misdemeanor convictions for driving while ability impaired while Monroe and Scorsone had clean criminal histories, records show.

According to a federal complaint, Monroe told investigators that last summer he lost his job and "to ease his boredom" he began exploring how to make home-made explosive devices.

"Monroe downloaded bomb recipes from the Internet and ordered the bomb-making chemicals," the complaint states. He sold some of the devices to his buddies, they occasionally smoked pot, and they liked to shoot rifles, according to federal prosecutors.

There are no indications the men were on a path to become the next Timothy McVeigh, a ringleader in the Oklahoma City bombing. Their attorneys cast them as having a fascination with guns — legal rifles — and as young men who simply liked to build large firecrackers and blow them up in fields.

The FBI turned its attention to the group in September on a tip from a New York Police Department, which had an informant, it turned out, who was a former schoolmate of Plunkett's at Hudson Valley Community College and who knew the men allegedly were willing to make and sell explosive devices.

The devices, according to defense attorneys in the case, were a little larger than an M-80, a powerful firecracker that has been sold in the United States for decades, even if illegally.

Over the past several months, the informant began buying explosives from the group for $10 each, records show. It's unclear whether the suspects knew what the informant would do with the devices. But the sting grew more serious in October when records show the informant asked Plunkett if they could add "fragmentation" to the devices.

Plunkett apparently had never done that before, but he went to a local pharmacy and purchased glue that he used to stick BBs on the devices, which have fuses and cardboard exteriors. The addition of the fragments elevated the seriousness of the charges under federal law. Now, rather than the worst-case prospect of under two years behind bars, the three men could face more than eight years in prison if convicted on the top counts of manufacturing and trafficking destructive devices.

Another idea by the FBI also added fuel to the case when, on Dec. 4, the day before the arrests, the informant met Scorsone in a K-mart parking lot in Latham and allegedly gave him an AR-15 assault rifle in exchange for 50 explosive devices. Scorsone, a gun enthusiast, was "very excited" by the prospect of obtaining the gun, according to the complaint.

At a recent detention hearing, when a judge released the men on bond, their attorneys seized on the actions of the government informant, suggesting that the bombs became more dangerous and an illegal machine gun was made part of the deals largely because of the FBI's actions.

In court two weeks ago, Scorsone's attorney, Gene V. Primomo, questioned whether the three-month investigation was worth the result.

"I think it's prudent police work to utilize confidential informants ... in an attempt to catch sharks," Primomo told U.S. Magistrate Judge David R. Homer on Dec. 9. "What we have, your honor, are minnows. These devices are homemade fireworks."

Monday, December 22, 2008

Where'd the bailout money go? Shhhh, it's a secret

By MATT APUZZO

WASHINGTON — It's something any bank would demand to know before handing out a loan: Where's the money going?

But after receiving billions in aid from U.S. taxpayers, the nation's largest banks say they can't track exactly how they're spending the money or they simply refuse to discuss it.

"We've lent some of it. We've not lent some of it. We've not given any accounting of, 'Here's how we're doing it,'" said Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in emergency bailout money. "We have not disclosed that to the public. We're declining to."

The Associated Press contacted 21 banks that received at least $1 billion in government money and asked four questions: How much has been spent? What was it spent on? How much is being held in savings, and what's the plan for the rest?

None of the banks provided specific answers.....

The U.S. may need a new crystal ball

by John Brady Kiesling

Through the miracle of email I know I have at least one regular reader outside my immediate family. I therefore dedicate this column to Dr David Green, who suggested that I discuss "Global Trends 2025", a 120-page opus just released by the US National Intelligence Council (the text is free at http://www. dni. gov/nic/NIC-2025-project.html). As the title suggests, the report sets out to describe the global trends that will shape the world in 2025.

The NIC was created to coordinate and, where possible, popularise the work of the 16 official members of the "US Intelligence Community". Hollywood notwithstanding, this does not mean that 13 other agencies - the really secret ones, unlike CIA, DIA, and NSA ­ are tunnelling under the Acropolis to upload mind-control software into key Greek politicians and their spiritual advisers. Instead, the majority of intelligence community employees belong to overt outfits like the Treasury Department and Coast Guard, with jobs depressingly like my current one. They surf the internet, read newspapers, have coffee with each other, sneak off to the gym, and then write articles that will one day, if they are lucky, be honoured by an email from Dr Green.

In his email to me, Dr Green summarised the NIC study well enough that I don't need to.

"It paints an emergent global canvas uncannily like the decline of the British empire, eg decreasing American leverage in world politics, a paradigm economic shift from West to East, increased local nationalist disputes and a decline in the power of the dollar. It envisages a multipolar world by 2025 with increasing conflicts over water, oil, food etc."

Of course, what Dr Green was too polite to say was that this is not a description of what the world will look like in 2025; it is a description of the world looked like a few months ago, precisely when the NIC undertook its latest crash program of dining out with eminent international pundits. Pundits figured out centuries ago that the safest way to maintain a reputation for punditry is to predict the present rather than the future. And since, as Voltaire's Dr Pangloss (or maybe it was Leibniz) pointed out, we live in the best of all possible worlds, it would be impious to foresee a different world in any case.

Anti-Americanism will fade of its own accord, the NIC opines, collateral damage from America's shrinking power. Yes, but in that case so what? America needs global popularity only if it wants to be a global player. Terrorism will also subside, the NIC tentatively suggests, unless it doesn't. Unfortunately, when it comes to terrorism the NIC has a short, America-centred memory. It sees terrorism as a Middle Eastern phenomenon, the product of religious fanaticism and lack of democracy. If the NIC understood that terrorism is a tactic routinely used by the weaker side in power struggles, it would take a less languid stance towards the intensifying competition for resources within states already on the verge of failure.

If the weakness of the NIC is its parochialism, its strength is the leisure, money, and prestige to cozy up to actual scientists in possession of actual data. I was hoping, therefore, to learn what the US government really thinks will happen to global sea levels, at least a consensus guesstimate. But Vice President Cheney's icy claw apparently still loiters perilously close to Washington's collective windpipe. On global climate change, therefore, the NIC offered an uncontroversial Hollywood scenario, a freak hurricane putting Wall Street under water. This will happen some day, but worse things will have happened first.

What good are pundits if they have only weasel words for the impact of migration patterns that are already undermining European and American commitments to democratic values? How many millions of people will be put on the march by climate change is a question with deadly-serious implications for the future of democracy. Nor does the NIC seriously address the question of who will run out of irrigation water when. If an enlightened democracy like Greece cannot impose groundwater conservation on a few thousand cotton and citrus farmers, we can extrapolate the certainty of civil war and humanitarian catastrophe due to groundwater depletion in parts of Africa and Asia.

When a pundit washes his hands of catastrophe by saying the world will be multipolar, it is time to change the channel on your crystal ball. Even in the darkest days of the Cold War, "bipolarity" was a psychiatric disorder, not a description of the international scene. Viewed in enough detail to be meaningful, the world has never been anything but multipolar. At the height of US "unipolarity" in 2002, a dozen tribal chieftains, militant mullahs, Pakistani intel officers, or narco-traffickers still possessed the same capability as the US government to project power (eg, fifteen armed men or $20,000) into a given Afghan village. Adding Chinese or Indians to the mix, an important but also obvious NIC prediction for 2025, only reinforces the common-sense message that what proved impossible for a rich and self-confident superpower may also be difficult for a Iraq-scalded and indebted one. So we must build international institutions sturdy enough to cope with the huge, complex emergencies that will be taking place simultaneously in many parts of the globe.

The main point of making dire predictions is to change our behaviour enough to make our predictions turn out wrong. The NIC staff timidly invites the next US president to take measures to change the future, but is not brave enough to suggest how. Perhaps this fuzzy, harmless report will help President-elect Obama forgive the NIC's 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction." But unless the experts go out on a limb by suggesting pragmatic solutions to a few of the perfectly predictable demographic/envi- ronmental, economic/political crises looming before our noses, new secretary of state Hillary Clinton will end up stuck in a present no less ugly for the remarkable ability of US-sponsored pundits to "predict" it accurately.