Monday, December 22, 2008

Where'd the bailout money go? Shhhh, it's a secret

By MATT APUZZO

WASHINGTON — It's something any bank would demand to know before handing out a loan: Where's the money going?

But after receiving billions in aid from U.S. taxpayers, the nation's largest banks say they can't track exactly how they're spending the money or they simply refuse to discuss it.

"We've lent some of it. We've not lent some of it. We've not given any accounting of, 'Here's how we're doing it,'" said Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in emergency bailout money. "We have not disclosed that to the public. We're declining to."

The Associated Press contacted 21 banks that received at least $1 billion in government money and asked four questions: How much has been spent? What was it spent on? How much is being held in savings, and what's the plan for the rest?

None of the banks provided specific answers.....

The U.S. may need a new crystal ball

by John Brady Kiesling

Through the miracle of email I know I have at least one regular reader outside my immediate family. I therefore dedicate this column to Dr David Green, who suggested that I discuss "Global Trends 2025", a 120-page opus just released by the US National Intelligence Council (the text is free at http://www. dni. gov/nic/NIC-2025-project.html). As the title suggests, the report sets out to describe the global trends that will shape the world in 2025.

The NIC was created to coordinate and, where possible, popularise the work of the 16 official members of the "US Intelligence Community". Hollywood notwithstanding, this does not mean that 13 other agencies - the really secret ones, unlike CIA, DIA, and NSA ­ are tunnelling under the Acropolis to upload mind-control software into key Greek politicians and their spiritual advisers. Instead, the majority of intelligence community employees belong to overt outfits like the Treasury Department and Coast Guard, with jobs depressingly like my current one. They surf the internet, read newspapers, have coffee with each other, sneak off to the gym, and then write articles that will one day, if they are lucky, be honoured by an email from Dr Green.

In his email to me, Dr Green summarised the NIC study well enough that I don't need to.

"It paints an emergent global canvas uncannily like the decline of the British empire, eg decreasing American leverage in world politics, a paradigm economic shift from West to East, increased local nationalist disputes and a decline in the power of the dollar. It envisages a multipolar world by 2025 with increasing conflicts over water, oil, food etc."

Of course, what Dr Green was too polite to say was that this is not a description of what the world will look like in 2025; it is a description of the world looked like a few months ago, precisely when the NIC undertook its latest crash program of dining out with eminent international pundits. Pundits figured out centuries ago that the safest way to maintain a reputation for punditry is to predict the present rather than the future. And since, as Voltaire's Dr Pangloss (or maybe it was Leibniz) pointed out, we live in the best of all possible worlds, it would be impious to foresee a different world in any case.

Anti-Americanism will fade of its own accord, the NIC opines, collateral damage from America's shrinking power. Yes, but in that case so what? America needs global popularity only if it wants to be a global player. Terrorism will also subside, the NIC tentatively suggests, unless it doesn't. Unfortunately, when it comes to terrorism the NIC has a short, America-centred memory. It sees terrorism as a Middle Eastern phenomenon, the product of religious fanaticism and lack of democracy. If the NIC understood that terrorism is a tactic routinely used by the weaker side in power struggles, it would take a less languid stance towards the intensifying competition for resources within states already on the verge of failure.

If the weakness of the NIC is its parochialism, its strength is the leisure, money, and prestige to cozy up to actual scientists in possession of actual data. I was hoping, therefore, to learn what the US government really thinks will happen to global sea levels, at least a consensus guesstimate. But Vice President Cheney's icy claw apparently still loiters perilously close to Washington's collective windpipe. On global climate change, therefore, the NIC offered an uncontroversial Hollywood scenario, a freak hurricane putting Wall Street under water. This will happen some day, but worse things will have happened first.

What good are pundits if they have only weasel words for the impact of migration patterns that are already undermining European and American commitments to democratic values? How many millions of people will be put on the march by climate change is a question with deadly-serious implications for the future of democracy. Nor does the NIC seriously address the question of who will run out of irrigation water when. If an enlightened democracy like Greece cannot impose groundwater conservation on a few thousand cotton and citrus farmers, we can extrapolate the certainty of civil war and humanitarian catastrophe due to groundwater depletion in parts of Africa and Asia.

When a pundit washes his hands of catastrophe by saying the world will be multipolar, it is time to change the channel on your crystal ball. Even in the darkest days of the Cold War, "bipolarity" was a psychiatric disorder, not a description of the international scene. Viewed in enough detail to be meaningful, the world has never been anything but multipolar. At the height of US "unipolarity" in 2002, a dozen tribal chieftains, militant mullahs, Pakistani intel officers, or narco-traffickers still possessed the same capability as the US government to project power (eg, fifteen armed men or $20,000) into a given Afghan village. Adding Chinese or Indians to the mix, an important but also obvious NIC prediction for 2025, only reinforces the common-sense message that what proved impossible for a rich and self-confident superpower may also be difficult for a Iraq-scalded and indebted one. So we must build international institutions sturdy enough to cope with the huge, complex emergencies that will be taking place simultaneously in many parts of the globe.

The main point of making dire predictions is to change our behaviour enough to make our predictions turn out wrong. The NIC staff timidly invites the next US president to take measures to change the future, but is not brave enough to suggest how. Perhaps this fuzzy, harmless report will help President-elect Obama forgive the NIC's 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction." But unless the experts go out on a limb by suggesting pragmatic solutions to a few of the perfectly predictable demographic/envi- ronmental, economic/political crises looming before our noses, new secretary of state Hillary Clinton will end up stuck in a present no less ugly for the remarkable ability of US-sponsored pundits to "predict" it accurately.

Terrorism spurs interest in Israeli tech



The Defense Ministry and Israeli security companies have received a growing number of requests for homeland security technology since the terror attacks in Mumbai last month, top defense officials said Thursday, leading to speculation that Israeli defense exports will increase dramatically in 2009.
"With more than 200 tall buildings in Atlanta, we need to consider revolutionary rescue and evacuation solutions, like Escape Rescue System," he said.

Since the attack, which killed over 170 people, including a number of Israelis, India and other countries have turned to Israeli defense industries and consultants.

One example was a visit to Israel last week by a high-level delegation from the US state of Georgia to view a new evacuation platform that could be used to rescue hostages in an attack like that in Mumbai.

Designated by the US Department of Homeland Security as a Qualified Anti-terrorism Technology, the external evacuation platform, manufactured by Escape Rescue Systems, provides fight and flight capabilities for emergencies in high-rise buildings.

In a full five-cabin configuration, the system can deliver up to 25 SWAT personnel and rescue 150 people every eight minutes, according to the company.

"The tragic events in Mumbai and the changed skyline of New York are reminders of the pride we have in our cities and of the necessity to prepare for another 9/11, a fire or a terrorist hostage-taking situation," said John Oxendine, insurance and safety fire commissioner of Georgia.

India has reportedly decided to purchase four Israeli EL/M-2083 aerostat radar systems to help defend the country against a 9/11-type attack.

According to reports in the Indian press, the radar, manufactured by Elta Systems of Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), would be deployed in strategic areas to provide early warning against incoming enemy aircraft and missiles.

The phased-array aerostat system is a simpler version of the Green Pine radar, made by IAI and used by the Arrow missile defense system. It is mounted on tethered blimps, which enables it to detect intrusions earlier than ground-based systems.

Defense officials have said that the Mumbai attacks raised awareness around the world for the need to obtain advanced surveillance equipment and counter-terrorism capabilities. They added that it was possible that arms sales in 2009 would surpass the $4.1 billion in sales in 2008.

"Countries are more aware of their vulnerabilities," one official said. "There is more interest today in Israeli products since we have loads of experience in combating terrorism."

Officials said that India was specifically interested in procuring basic weaponry that could be used in counter-terror operations. It has already purchased Tavor assault rifles made by Israel Weapon Industries as well as night-vision goggles made by Israel Military Industries.

"They are interested in getting more basic supplies for operations such as the one launched against [the] Mumbai attackers," the official said.

US report urges better foodborne disease monitoring

By Jane Byrne
A new US report concludes that major gaps remain in many critical areas of preparedness for health emergencies, including foodborne disease reporting.

Trust for America's Health (TFAH) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) have released the sixth annual Ready or Not? Protecting the Public’s Health from Diseases, Disasters, and Bioterrorism report.

This edition of the report found that 20 states did not meet or exceed the national US average rate for being able to identify the pathogens responsible for foodborne disease outbreaks in their states, and it references some of the more serious 2008 US health emergencies including the Salmonella outbreak in jalapeno and Serrano peppers that sickened 1,442 people in 43 states and the largest beef recall in US history in February.

"Monitoring the public’s food supply is a real world example of public health preparedness as it requires the same skills and technologies needed to detect and mitigate bioterrorism and infectious disease outbreaks,” states the report.

Foodborne disease reporting

According to the Ready or Not? report, between 2004 and 2006, the last year for which US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data was available at the time of publication, state public health departments reported a total of 3,548 foodborne disease outbreaks that sickened 74,077 individuals.

Of the 3,548 reported outbreaks, state public health departments were only able to confirm the etiology, or causative pathogen, in 1,552 cases, or 44 per cent of outbreaks,” said the authors.

Identifying foodborne disease outbreaks requires regular submission of clinical isolates and specimens to state public health labs, continued the report.

The publication states that, in the opinion of the US Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), hospital and clinical laboratories are sometimes reluctant to send isolates of foodborne pathogens to a state public health laboratory due to cost and time issues.

“Failure by these nongovernmental laboratories to submit isolates, specimens and samples could delay timely identification of an outbreak, prolonging exposure to the contaminated product and leading to increased incidence of disease,” claims the APHL.

State and local level invovlement

The authors of the Ready or Not? report argue that while much of the food safety debate has been over the reforms needed at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), the focus should also be on coordination and collaboration with food safety regulators and health officials at the state and local level.

In order to strengthen the roles of state and local agencies, in both their community-based food safety efforts and as integral parts of the nation’s food safety system, the report draws attention to the planned series of RWJF funded meetings among state and local officials, their federal counterparts, and food industry and consumer groups.

Participants at these meetings, according to the report, will focus on:

  • Formulating and expressing a modern vision of the role of state and local government in an integrated, prevention-oriented food safety system;
  • Identifying gaps or constraints in current law, policy and practice at the federal, state and local levels that inhibit fulfilment of that vision;
  • Recommending changes in law, policy, and practice that are needed to enhance the effectiveness of state and local agencies in addressing food safety problems at the local, state, and national level;
  • Identifying specific opportunities to improve collaboration among state, local, and federal agencies; and
  • Describing current funding patterns and resource needs at the state and local level.

The project will disseminate a report in 2009, according to the Ready or Not? authors.

Latest news in Quality & Safety

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Kenyan government imposes gag order on Obama family

The Kenyan government has barred unapproved contacts between the media and President-elect Barack Obama's extended family.

Family members will be required to receive permission from the government before making any public statements about their famous relative, according to the Nairobi Star.

"We are doing this because we want to ensure better flow of information," Athman Said, an under-secretary in the Ministry of Heritage, told the Obama family in Kogelo.

"The government has decided that you should inform its officers who will be based here if you want to address the media."

Journalists wishing to speak with the family must first be approved by the government ....

This is not the first attempt to block press interest in President-elect Obama's African connections.

Prior to the U.S. election, WND senior staff reporter Jerome R. Corsi was detained in Kenya while investigating Obama's close ties to the nation's prime minister, Raila Odinga.

The Kenyan official who reportedly orchestrated the detention was Odinga himself, according to WND sources inside Kenya.


Corsi, whose recent book, "The Obama Nation," raised questions about the Democrat when he was a candidate for president, had scheduled a news conference in Nairobi to discuss his discoveries during his visit this fall.

However, he was detained by immigration officials and held without food for much of a day until he was escorted onto his already-booked flight leaving Kenya with the sendoff, "See you in hell."

Corsi had earlier seen the flow of information stymied by the Obama campaign itself:

"I was able to interview Obama's uncle, Sayid Obama, the brother of Obama's father, when I was doing the research for 'The Obama Nation,'" Corsi said. "But Auma Obama, Obama's half-sister, declined an interview by telephone, telling me that the Obama campaign had advised the Obama family not to speak with me, either from the United States by phone, or in person in Kenya."....

Under-secretary Said, who informed the Obamas they were muzzled, announced the Obama Cultural Home project, which will include a museum, a gallery and a leadership center in the family's town of Kogelo. A video featuring Mama Sarah Obama, the president-elect's step-grandmother, will relate the Obamas' family history. Said added that the Ministry of Heritage is negotiating with the U.S. government to display Obama's publications. ....

New York Office Building used by Iranian regime, seized by Feds

By Walid Phares

The US Government seized control last Wednesday of a New York City office building partially owned by a company with ties to the Iranian government. The Treasury and Justice Departments move is aimed to end a flow of cash used to help Iran's program of nuclear weapons. The seizure is raising troubling questions.

The tower, situated on New York's Fifth Avenue, was built by an Iranian non-profit group in the 1970s. Federal officials say that the ownership of the building has evolved in an attempt to hide the stake held by an Iranian state-owned bank. The US alleges that Assa Corporation, which owns the building, is a front for Bank Melli, which facilitates the funding of nuclear materials for the Iranian regime. US authorities say that Bank Melli is involved in the Assa Corp. management of the Fifth Avenue facility. According to reports, rental income was sent back to Iran. But the designation does not interfere with the business and other activities of the tenants of 650 Fifth Avenue. In 2007, the Bush Administration froze Bank Melli's assets in the United States. The FBI seized two Assa's bank accounts holding $3.1 million.

According to Government sources Bank Melli handles funds for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards (Pasdaran) and its Qods Forces, which in turn fund Hezbollah, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad as well as some activities of the Taliban in Afghanistan.

This move raised several national security questions in the media and within the counter terrorism community:

1) Can the ownership of a building in Manhattan by entities controlled by the Iranian regime lead to a potential use of the facility by Terrorists or - in more dramatic circumstances- to sneak a dirty bomb or a nuke?

2) Should we be surprised that the Iranian intelligence and agencies operate such a facility in New York or in other cities in the US?

In an interview with Fox News I made the several of the following points:

a. We shouldn't be surprised at all that the Iranian regime is trying to have access to such assets. Their strategy is to have as many of these assets in the U.S. The chain begins in Tehran where the tasked agencies try to build a map of similar locations in America for future potential operations.

b. The goal for such locations is multiple. The Terrorist component could include hideouts for operatives (as in Mumbai) or worse, a location to deploy dirty bombs or more.

c. The United States and other democracies have an open space for trade. Hence Iranian funded networks can own, co-own or manage these assets. These locations can be used by other elements than those who manages the locations.

d. Even though these types of assets can be used in the future, we need to keep in mind that its took some time for the preparation for 9/11 or Mumbai. Hence if the Iranian regime is indeed managing these assets now, it would be to have it handy when and if it needs to use them in the future.

e. The New York Law Enforcement agencies and authorities are among the best in the nation and worldwide. They do have an understanding of the enemy's strategies. Hence they are on top of it in as much as possible. But there is no fully secure system against Terrorism.

Following is my interview on Fox News on December 20, 2008

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4038519135502808740&hl=en

December 21, 2008

Islam Waging Financial Jihad?

By Dale Hurd


CBNNews.com - U.S. dependence on oil has led to an unprecedented transfer of wealth to the Muslim nations of the Middle East. And now it seems they are using that money to advance an Islamic agenda.

It's called Sharia-compliant finance. Sharia is best known in the West for the punishments it requires, including stoning for adultery, amputation for theft and death to those who leave Islam. Sharia finance claims to not allow profit from interest or risk, or from prohibited items such as pork or alcohol.

It would be one thing if Sharia finance was just another way for Muslims to invest their money, but critics of Sharia-compliant finance say it's a whole lot more than that.

"Sharia finance is a piece of what I call the stealth jihad," Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy said. He is one of the chief critics of Sharia Finance in Washington.

"It espouses, it embraces and it is designed to help advance a program, Sharia, that is seditious; that requires the destruction of our constitutional government," he added, calling it treason.

"It's about what its proponents have called financial jihad or jihad with money," he said.

Sharia Gains U.S. Support

Washington not only allows Sharia finance, the U.S. Treasury promotes it. Last month the Treasury Department sponsored a seminar called Islamic Finance 101.

Many banks, brokerages and insurers are also trying to lure money from the Middle East by offering Sharia-compliant products. That includes AIG, which went belly up and was taken over by U.S. government to the tune of $150 billion. That takeover means the U.S. government and taxpayers now have a stake in Sharia finance.

The Dow Jones Islamic Market Indexes was created for Sharia-compliant portfolios. It's advised by leading Muslim scholars.

Earlier this year, one of those advisors, Sheikh Taqi Usmani, was quietly removed from his position, after it was learned that he thought Muslims should engage in aggressive military jihad "to establish the supremacy of Islam" worldwide.

Muslims Thriving Off U.S. Recession

The recent market meltdown in the West has the Muslim world believing that now is their time.

"The collapse of the capitalist system based on usury and paper…is proof that it is in crisis and shows that the Islamic economic philosophy is holding up," leading Islamic scholar Dr. Yusef Al-Qaradawi said.

"All riches are ours," he added. "The Islamic nation has all or nearly all the oil and we have an economic philosophy that no one else has."

Al-Qaradaw urges Muslims to "profit from the crisis to bring about the triumph of the (Islamic) nation, which holds the spiritual and material resources for victory."

Marshall Sana, Islamic expert at the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity, a part of Barnabas Fund, added that "at the conclusion of the recent hajj in Mecca the Grand Mufti talked about the failure of capitalism. That we've seen the end of communism and we're seeing the failure of capitalism. The answer is Islamic finance. He said Sharia finance."

Sana says Sharia finance is actually a distortion of Korannic teachings, and was traditionally understood to prohibit usury rather than interest. He says it was not widely practiced by Muslims until recent decades, and believes it is being promoted now as a financial weapon against the West.

"It's war footing," he said. "And it's setting up not only a separatism and a segregation, but it's attaching it to Sharia law, which we all know is a supremacist ideology."

"It has inequality built into it, between woman and men and Muslims and non-Muslims," he added. "If you look at the literature and you look at the internal dialogue, the end is supremacy. The end is controlling institutions. It's setting up an Islamic economy and an Islamic economy is to be the world economy. "

Calls Against Sharia

A lawsuit was filed Dec. 15 in federal court against the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve board for supporting Sharia in violation of the First Amendment. The suit also seeks to stop any bailout money from going to AIG.

Gaffney is outraged that the government and Wall Street are welcoming Sharia finance.

"Today it's happening at the Treasury Department under the Bush administration, to say nothing of what will happen under the Obama administration-- actively promoting the activity," he said. "It's madness. It's reckless. I think if most Americans knew what was going on here, if they knew what was at stake, would be horrified."

Announcing The Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor Project (JTTM)

from MEMRI

Beginning today, MEMRI's Islamist Websites Monitor Project website will operate under its new format, and will have a new name - The Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM). You will be able to register as a member and will have access to materials from this project.

The following is a description of this new MEMRI project:

MEMRI's Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM) scrutinizes Islamist terrorism worldwide, with a special focus on the Arab world, Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. By monitoring strategic, tactical, ideological, military, and conventional and non-conventional threats to public safety and security, both imminent and potential - and to crucial interests and assets of states targeted by terrorism, MEMRI's JTTM enables those under threat to effectively address and confront these threats.

The JTTM focuses on threats posed by independent terror organizations as well as by state-sponsored terrorism.

JTTM translations and analysis feature material from sources monitored around the clock, include

• Online media: The 100 most important Islamist sites and blogs.

  • Printed media: From all Arab countries, as well as Arabic-language London dailies and magazines and Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, and Turkey.
  • Visual media: TV channels from the Arab world and Iran as well as jihadist videos posted online from all over the world.
  • Audio media: Cassettes and radio broadcasts from various Arab countries as well as from Pakistan and Afghanistan.

• The JTTM Website will include the following sections:

  • Alert Planning & Training (APT)
  • Global Jihad News (GJN)
  • Jihadi Texts (JT)
  • In-Depth Threat Analysis (IDA)
  • Global Jihad - Opposition & Dissent (GJ-O&D)

• JTTM content focuses on the following:

  • Threats to Western strategic and economic interests:
  • Oil facilities and transportation, such as sea ports and the Strait of Hormuz
  • Civil infrastructure, such as water systems, power grids, gas pipelines
    Electronic jihad, such as attacks on databases, banking systems, and online retailers

• Threats to Western military forces worldwide:

  • Instructional videos on attacking U.S. MPVs and other military vehicles, and on
    preparing IEDs
  • Instructions for using technologies such as Google Earth and WikiMapia to assess
    vulnerabilities of U.S. military bases
  • Threats against U.S.civilian administration and Western companies and organizations
    and their employees in the Middle East
  • Development of jihadists' military and technological capabilities:
  • Manuals on manufacturing and using explosives, as well as household chemicals, poisons, booby-traps, light weaponry, etc.
  • Texts and videos for training terrorists to plan and carry out attacks
  • Guides for manufacturing WMDs

• New ideological trends and major ideological debates within the jihadist camp:

  • Changes in fundamental traditional notions, such as religious legitimacy and legitimate leadership
  • The ongoing debate over the religious boundaries of permissible jihad against infidels,
    including the killing of civilians and the use of WMDs, as well as online crime such as credit card information theft
  • Oppositions and conflicts within the jihad camp
  • Renunciation of jihad by major Islamist groups and prominent jihad leaders

• The global jihad network:

  • Information about existing and new jihad organizations
  • Emerging alliances among various jihad groups
  • Collaboration between combatant and non-combatant jihadists such as those engaging
    in media jihad
  • State-planned and state-sponsored terrorism, such as Iranian suicide units and suicide boats in the Persian Gulf

• News from the various jihad fronts

Steps to Register:

To register for MEMRI's JTTM Project, go to the Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM) site and click "Subscription" at the top of the page.

Please allow approximately five business days for us to process your application; at that time you will be sent a secure link to use to make your membership payment.

During our initial launch phase, there may be a slight delay due to the volume of applications and due to the holiday season. Once payment is received, your account will be activated and you will have full access to the site.

Contact Information:

For more information about MEMRI's JTTM Project, write to JTTM@MEMRI.ORG ; for information about subscribing, write to JTTMSUBS@MEMRI.ORG.

Is The President Above The Law?

(Compiler's note: A must read article. We are likely to hear more about these charges in days to come.)

from The Chattanooga.Com

Unknown to many in the mainstream press, the United States Senate issues a bipartisan report this week on detainee abuses in the war on terror. The report, authored by Sen. Levin (D) and Sen. McCain (R), verifies that human rights have been violated and lays blame for the illegal torture of prisoners at the feet of Donald Rumsfeld and other senior administration officials.

The details contained in the report are appalling. Along with assault, sleep deprivation, denial of religious rights, sexual humiliation, and other physical torture; the report contends numerous instances of homicide occurred. The President, in his ever increasing aloof attitude for established law, decided that he and his military could treat prisoners any way they deemed necessary: despite the law. They did this in spite of U.S. law against the torture of prisoners in U.S. custody, and in spite of the Geneva Convention.

Is the President above the law? Not even 20 years ago a Texas sheriff was given 10 years in a federal penitentiary for "water-boarding" prisoners in an attempt to extract a confession. Vice President Dick Cheney, in his ever increasing criminal attitude (this man has never served his country and took five deferments during the Vietnam War), made public statements in the past few days in support of the torture of prisoners. These men act just like mobsters; arrogant, no culture, petty, and little respect for established law.

When are our U.S. attorney's going to stand up to the plate and bring criminal charges against these men? After all, all U.S. attorney's are sworn to protect and defend the US Constitution. The Senate report claims that the actions of the Administration brought great harm to our national security, ruined our "high road" image around the world, and gave extremists motivation to carry out more terror attacks. These men have not only ruined the credibility of the 'very' country that authored the Nuremberg Trials that convicted high ranking Nazis, but by their ignorant actions they possibly have ensure the torture of captured U.S. military personnel.

The Administration has consistently claimed that abuses were the work of lower ranking military personnel. Some of these military personnel have been tried for their crimes. This is a travesty. The men who should be tried and sent to prison are the President, Vice President, Secretary of Defense, and the former Attorney General. We should look a lot further too. Congressman Zach Wamp has not made one public statement condemning the use of torture on prisoners. Neither has Sen. Alexander. Sen. Corker is a late-comer to the "Great Game," so he narrowly escapes incrimination. We can only imagine what Congressman Wamp's attitude would be on extracting confessions if being elected governor of Tennessee.

I distinctly remember Congressman Wamp being caught up in "Islamophobia" and making several hysterical public statements demonizing Islamic radicals. The tone used by Congressman Wamp in his statements was one of fear and we don't need a chief executive of our State of Tennessee who is easily scared. People make serious mistakes when they are in fear. Fear pushes us to lash out or demonize those that scare us. Once the enemy is demonized; the disregard for due process and human rights soon follows.

I am sure there will be many comments condemning my remarks. They will most likely come from those who have never served their country in the military, don't understand how important national image is, or those who are just sadists. I would remind those people that we've already fought one war (the Revolution) because the King was torturing our citizen's. I remember.

The "liberal" press has yet to give this story adequate coverage.

Stemming the Rise of Islamic Extremism in Bangladesh

Sajeeb A. Wazed is an adviser to Sheikh Hasina, the former Prime Minister of Bangladesh and President of the Awami League, the largest and oldest political party in Bangladesh. He has been a key negotiator for the Awami League on several occasions, most recently in the negotiations for the restoration of democracy in Bangladesh with the present military government. He has a Master's in Public Administration from Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

Carl J. Ciovacco graduated from the Kennedy School of Government with a Masters of Public Policy in International Security and Political Economy. His recent thesis on Al Qaeda's media strategy and was written for the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. He received his Bachelor of Science in International Relations from West Point and served as an Army officer in Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

Bangladesh has been a secular Muslim state since its independence from Pakistan and founding by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1971. While its short history has been full of military coup d’états, it has always returned to its roots as a secular democratic state. There are, however, troubling new signs of a shift towards a growing Islamism that could jeopardize the sanctity of secularism in the country. While the governing construct’s legitimacy is suffering politically from the past two years of emergency military rule, Islamism may be the biggest threat to the country’s Constitution and secular underpinnings. As elections are scheduled for December 18th and the two major political parties jostle over the country’s future, each party’s vision for the proper mix of Islam and government will be at the forefront. Rahman’s Awami League has long been the standard bearer of secularism and if elected, it could roll back the growing tide of Islamism in Bangladesh. The Awami League must, however, implement certain changes to proactively check this Islamism if it hopes to secure long-lasting secularism and democracy. If successful, an Awami League-led Bangladesh could be the global example of secular governance in a Muslim country. .... click on the title above for the balance of a three page article.

Online Jihadists Plan for 'Invading Facebook'

By Noah Shachtman

Online jihadists have already used YouTube, blogs and other social media to spread their propaganda. Now, a group of internet Islamic extremists is putting together a plan for "invading Facebook."

"We can use Facebook to fight the media," notes a recent posting on the extremist al-Faloja forum, translated by Jihadica.com. "We can post media on Facebook that shows the Crusader losses."

"We have already had great success in raiding YouTube," the poster adds. "American politicians have used Facebook to get votes, like the house slave Obama."

Groups like al-Qaida were pioneering users of the internet — to train, share ideas and organize. But some observers, like George Washington University professor Marc Lynch, see a reluctance to embrace Web 2.0 tools like Facebook. "One of the biggest problems for a virtual network like AQ today is that it needs to build connections between its members while protecting itself from its enemies. That's a filtering problem: How do you get your people in, and keep intelligence agents out?" he asks.

But as Jihadica.com author and West Point Combating Terrorism Center fellow William McCants notes, the proposed Facebook invasion "is not an attempt to replicate [existing] social networks." Instead, "the members of the campaign want to exploit existing networks of people who are hostile to them and presumably they will adopt new identities once they have posted their material."

The al-Faloja poster suggests seven "brigades" work together within Facebook. One will distribute videos and writing of so-called "martyrs." Another will spread military training material. Most of them will work in Arabic, presumably. But one of the units will focus just on spread English-language propaganda through Facebook.

AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs

(Compiler's note: I just report, you decide ...)

By FRANK BASS and RITA BEAMISH

Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits last year, an Associated Press analysis reveals.

The rewards came even at banks where poor results last year foretold the economic crisis that sent them to Washington for a government rescue. Some trimmed their executive compensation due to lagging bank performance, but still forked over multimillion-dollar executive pay packages.

Benefits included cash bonuses, stock options, personal use of company jets and chauffeurs, home security, country club memberships and professional money management, the AP review of federal securities documents found.

The total amount given to nearly 600 executives would cover bailout costs for many of the 116 banks that have so far accepted tax dollars to boost their bottom lines.

Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services committee and a long-standing critic of executive largesse, said the bonuses tallied by the AP review amount to a bribe "to get them to do the jobs for which they are well paid in the first place.

"Most of us sign on to do jobs and we do them best we can," said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. "We're told that some of the most highly paid people in executive positions are different. They need extra money to be motivated!"

The AP compiled total compensation based on annual reports that the banks file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The 116 banks have so far received $188 billion in taxpayer help. Among the findings:

_The average paid to each of the banks' top executives was $2.6 million in salary, bonuses and benefits.

_Lloyd Blankfein, president and chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, took home nearly $54 million in compensation last year. The company's top five executives received a total of $242 million.

This year, Goldman will forgo cash and stock bonuses for its seven top-paid executives. They will work for their base salaries of $600,000, the company said. Facing increasing concern by its own shareholders on executive payments, the company described its pay plan last spring as essential to retain and motivate executives "whose efforts and judgments are vital to our continued success, by setting their compensation at appropriate and competitive levels." Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday declined to comment beyond that written report.

The New York-based company on Dec. 16 reported its first quarterly loss since it went public in 1999. It received $10 billion in taxpayer money on Oct. 28.

_Even where banks cut back on pay, some executives were left with seven- or eight-figure compensation that most people can only dream about. Richard D. Fairbank, the chairman of Capital One Financial Corp. (COF) (COF), took a $1 million hit in compensation after his company had a disappointing year, but still got $17 million in stock options. The McLean, Va.-based company received $3.56 billion in bailout money on Nov. 14.

_John A. Thain, chief executive officer of Merrill Lynch, topped all corporate bank bosses with $83 million in earnings last year. Thain, a former chief operating officer for Goldman Sachs, took the reins of the company in December 2007, avoiding the blame for a year in which Merrill lost $7.8 billion. Since he began work late in the year, he earned $57,692 in salary, a $15 million signing bonus and an additional $68 million in stock options.

Like Goldman, Merrill got $10 billion from taxpayers on Oct. 28.

The AP review comes amid sharp questions about the banks' commitment to the goals of the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), a law designed to buy bad mortgages and other troubled assets. Last month, the Bush administration changed the program's goals, instructing the Treasury Department to pump tax dollars directly into banks in a bid to prevent wholesale economic collapse.

The program set restrictions on some executive compensation for participating banks, but did not limit salaries and bonuses unless they had the effect of encouraging excessive risk to the institution. Banks were barred from giving golden parachutes to departing executives and deducting some executive pay for tax purposes.

Banks that got bailout funds also paid out millions for home security systems, private chauffeured cars, and club dues. Some banks even paid for financial advisers. Wells Fargo of San Francisco, which took $25 billion in taxpayer bailout money, gave its top executives up to $20,000 each to pay personal financial planners.

At Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK), chief executive Robert P. Kelly's stipend for financial planning services came to $66,748, on top of his $975,000 salary and $7.5 million bonus. His car and driver cost $178,879. Kelly also received $846,000 in relocation expenses, including help selling his home in Pittsburgh and purchasing one in Manhattan, the company said.

Goldman Sachs' tab for leased cars and drivers ran as high as $233,000 per executive. The firm told its shareholders this year that financial counseling and chauffeurs are important in giving executives more time to focus on their jobs.

JPMorgan Chase chairman James Dimon ran up a $211,182 private jet travel tab last year when his family lived in Chicago and he was commuting to New York. The company got $25 billion in bailout funds.

Banks cite security to justify personal use of company aircraft for some executives. But Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., questioned that rationale, saying executives visit many locations more vulnerable than the nation's security-conscious commercial air terminals.

Sherman, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said pay excesses undermine development of good bank economic policies and promote an escalating pay spiral among competing financial institutions - something particularly hard to take when banks then ask for rescue money.

He wants them to come before Congress, like the automakers did, and spell out their spending plans for bailout funds.

"The tougher we are on the executives that come to Washington, the fewer will come for a bailout," he said.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

World Bank: Russia may need help if oil falls more

By CATRINA STEWART

MOSCOW (AP) - Russia would come under crippling financial pressure and may need to raise money externally if oil languishes at an average of $30 a barrel over the next two years, the World Bank predicted Friday.

The bleak scenario would mark a rapid unraveling of Russia's oil-fueled economic gains over the past eight years, during which time the government has paid down most of its foreign debt and built up a vast stockpile of international reserves.

"If oil prices in 2009 and 2010 average $30 a barrel, that would be a nightmare scenario for a global economy," Zeljko Bogetic, the World Bank's chief economist in Russia told investors on Friday. "The pressures on the current account and public finances in Russia would quickly rise to a point where the financing constraint would become so sharp that it's possible even to envisage Russia's return from a creditor to international organisations to (that of) a borrower."

At $50 a barrel, Russia could drain much of its reserve funds and run budgetary deficits, but would not face a "meltdown" scenario, said Bogetic.

Oil prices took a sharp turn downward this week, with the February light sweet crude contract trading just over $42 a barrel—more than $100 lower than its July peak—despite a large output cut pledged this week by oil producers' cartel OPEC.

Some major oil-importing countries have criticized OPEC's move to push up prices during a global slowdown.

The World Bank currently forecasts an average oil price of $75 a barrel over the next two years, said Bogetic.

Among emerging markets, Russia has been one of the hardest hit by the global financial crisis and plunging oil prices, the mainstay of the Russian economy. These factors have put the national currency under intense strain and triggered massive stock market losses and capital outflows from the country.

Russia, which grew at over 8 percent last year, is facing a severe slowdown in growth, and possibly even recession next year, analysts say. Torrid figures released earlier this week showed that industrial output had plunged 10.8 percent in November from the previous month, signaling a dramatic slowdown in the final quarter.

"Clearly we are in the middle of a major growth recession in Russia," said Bogetic. "I would call it a growth recession, not an output recession—yet."

He said the World Bank had tweaked its earlier projection of 3 percent growth next year to between 2-3 percent.

Some judges delay swearing-in of citizens, report says

WASHINGTON — Federal judges in some parts of the United States have delayed citizenship oaths for immigrants, apparently to keep millions of dollars in fees that would otherwise go to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, according to a new government report and immigration officials. ....

It’s Time to Uproot the Real Cause of the Mortgage Crisis

(Compiler's note: Yes - this is a must read article -- what is being discussed here impacts our national security.)

Or else American taxpayers will be called upon to bail out the economy again.

from Pajamas Media

As banks, insurance companies, brokerage firms, automobile manufacturers, and God knows who else line up to try and feed at the public trough, the original source of the spreading financial and credit crisis, the mortgage industry, is still in deep trouble. Whether the initial bailout plan passed by Congress will help stem mortgage lenders’ financial problems in the short run is still an open question. But one thing is certain: Nothing in the original legislation or Treasury’s actions and infusion of funds since then have made the legal, regulatory, and enforcement changes required to prevent this problem from happening again in the long run — no matter how many tax dollars the Treasury Department pours into the problem.

Nothing in the mortgage bailout legislation called for Congress to fix the serious problems with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that empower ACORN-style pressure tactics against lenders. Nothing made the Federal Reserve change its lending instructions. Nothing urged the president to change the enforcement policies at the Justice Department and HUD that forced lenders to make risky loans to unqualified applicants.

At its most basic level, this crisis started because of the weakening of mortgage lending standards caused by the Federal Reserve and other federal agencies. Lenders also feared facing discrimination claims and enforcement actions by government law enforcement agencies and organizations such as ACORN.

Consider a faulty study the Boston Fed conducted in the 1990s. It claimed that minority mortgage applicants were rejected at higher rates because of discrimination. Yet a detailed analysis by University of Texas economists Stan Liebowitz and Theodore Day showed that the Boston Fed study was so full of data transcription errors that it was “outrageously unreliable.” When those errors were eliminated, there was no discrimination. Some minority groups do have a higher rejection rate for mortgages on average, but because of weaker credit histories, not discrimination by lenders.

Undaunted, the Boston Fed issued a new manual that called traditional lending standards like creditworthiness and down payment requirements “outdated” and “discriminatory” because they supposedly prevented minorities from getting loans. Other federal agencies joined in. The FDIC still has a compliance manual that discourages banks from requiring an “excellent” credit rating or “adequate” longevity on the job because it may have a “disparate impact” on minority applicants. This despite the current crisis and the fact that in 2007 the Federal Reserve finally admitted in a report to Congress that credit scores are “predictive of credit risk for the populations as a whole and for all major demographic groups.”

Mortgage lenders were also pressured to adopt these weakened standards by the Community Reinvestment Act. If they couldn’t show enough lending in minority neighborhoods to bad credit risks, they could be accused of discrimination, their charter renewals or merger deals held up by third party “community” organizations like ACORN. These organizations used the CRA as an extortion racket to get money for themselves (so they could do things like “counsel” high-risk borrowers) and to get mortgage funds directed to borrowers who had no down payments, no steady employment, and terrible credit histories. And everyone in Congress and the executive branch are wringing their hands over how to keep these borrowers in mortgages they cannot afford, rather than getting them out and thereby stopping the hemorrhaging in the lending industry.

As Professor Liebowitz said in testimony before Congress this past summer, the government’s entire housing policy was based “on a false claim, or lie” that mortgage lenders were discriminating against minorities. This lie was also pushed by the liberal civil rights community and the Congressional Black Caucus — and it was repeated “over and over again. Eventually this lie began to poison the mortgage market, and now the entire economy is at risk.” The secondary market necessary for the securitization of all of these bad mortgages (by bundling and packaging them together) accepted the constant reassurances by the Fed, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other government agencies that these high-risk mortgages were perfectly safe.

So where does the bailout plan direct the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and all the other federal agencies involved in banking and lending to change their compliance manuals and regulations to allow mortgage lenders to tighten their lending standards? Where does it tell them to go back to traditional methods of determining creditworthiness without putting their charters in jeopardy or being accused of discrimination? Where are the amendments to the CRA to prevent lenders from being blackmailed into making more of these bad loans? Where are the president’s directives to the Justice Department and HUD banning the use of “disparate impact” in their enforcement actions and ordering those agencies to consider individual creditworthiness and other traditional lending requirements when investigating discrimination claims? You haven’t seen any of these directives because they don’t exist — and they are just as unlikely to come from the new administration.

You don’t hear any plans by anyone in Congress, the Federal Reserve Board, or in other federal agencies to take any of these actions — because no government officials want to admit their role in the financial crisis or incur the wrath of the race hustlers. They don’t want to confront the Congressional Black Caucus or the NAACP or other liberal pressure groups that will do everything they can to oppose these changes.

In a hearing in February, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) actually claimed that the only problem with the CRA was that it didn’t cover enough of the credit market. Now that the Treasury Department is essentially buying control of American banks, mortgage lenders, insurance companies, brokerage firms, and other industries as the crisis spreads, how long will it be before federal career bureaucrats start using the government’s new ownership interest to force those same institutions and industries to implement “new and improved” social policies in their lending, credit, brokerage, manufacturing, and insurance practices?

And who will continue to be the real victims of these policies, in addition to the American taxpayer who is funding the bailout or losing his job because of the economic distress of so many employers? It will be the borrowers, many of them minorities, who have been put into terrible financial straits by lending practices forced onto mortgage lenders by the government.

This overwhelming problem is not the result of too much “deregulation” of the financial industry. It is the result of coordinated government regulations and destructive racial preference enforcement policies that effectively pressured lenders to make billions of dollars of loans to individuals who lacked the financial means to repay them. With the regulatory structures that are the root and cause of this whole problem unchanged, the American taxpayer will almost certainly be called upon to bail the mortgage system out again, as well as all of the other sectors of our economy being hurt by the credit crunch it engendered.

What Osama bin Laden Might Look Like in Disguise

By Paul Bedard

Ever wonder what terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden might look like if he shaved his trademark beard and turned in his robes and camouflage for a western business suit? Well, apparently so did the intelligence analysts at the National Counterterrorism Center. In their popular annual desk calendar, just received at Whispers, a page about the al Qaeda leader features an altered photograph, showing a neatly trimmed bin Laden in a dark suit and tie, looking more like a used-car dealer than a guerrilla fighter.

Bin Laden has a $27 million bounty on his head and a distinctive visage that has become remarkably familiar over the past decade, but the Westernized Osama looks surprisingly different. Still, it's a face only his mother could kiss. And there are some things he won't be able to disguise. The NCTC's calendar points out that he remains unusually tall (somewhere between 6 foot 4 and 6 foot 6) and walks with a cane. The NCTC, which is the U.S. intelligence community’s primary analytical shop for terrorism, has not yet posted its 2009 calendar, but the 2008 version is on its website.

Does our Federal Government Take Money Management Advice from Bernard Madoff?

(Compiler's note: I don't know about your home finances, but I've never been able to get out of debt by spending more and more money -- nor have I ever known anyone to achieve success with this method. Are you beginning to wonder about the wisdom of our long-standing national approach to solving the problem of crushing debt?)

by
Cliff Kincaid

Business cable network CNBC is asking, in a special report, whether investment manager Bernard Madoff pulled off the “scam of the century.” But Madoff is only accused of a $50 billion heist. That’s peanuts compared to what the politicians have done to us.

On Monday, December 15, in a story that went unnoticed, the General Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the federal government has failed another financial audit. It was the 12th year in a row that the federal government has been unable to accurately report on its fiscal condition. Frankly, nobody knows precisely where the money is going. But we know where it’s coming from - the beleaguered taxpayers.
We have all seen the film footage of Madoff leaving his New York apartment and being pushed around by a horde of photographers and cameramen trying to get a shot of him. Why aren’t the politicians being surrounded in similar fashion for destroying the financial stability of our country?
Almost every day we see a story that misses the big picture. On Thursday, President-elect Obama announced his pick to run the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Politicians are demanding to know why the agency failed to detect the Madoff fraud and what it will do in the future to uncover other fraudulent financial schemes. But what about the federal government’s own massive financial fraud, as documented by the GAO itself?
The GAO report was released one day before President Bush told CNN’s Candy Crowley that, in order to avoid economic collapse, he had to abandon freedom in order to save it. “I’ve abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system,” he declared.
When I heard that Bush had made that statement, I thought it had to be a misquote. But then I played the tape of the interview and heard it for myself. “Stop me before I throw a shoe” was conservative commentator Michelle Malkin’s reaction to Bush’s CNN comments.
I feel a sense of obligation to my successor to make sure there is not a huge economic crisis,” Bush told Crowley. So he was panicked by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson into pushing Congress to approve a $700-billion Wall Street bailout plan. What he got was a huge economic crisis. Our salvation now lies in Obama, a socialist who wants to spread the wealth around and spend even more money, perhaps as much as $1 trillion in a new “stimulus.”
The Bush comments about destroying free markets to save them wasn’t much of a controversy in the major media. Perhaps this was because so many media personalities were busy with other things. Some were lining up at the White House Christmas Party on Tuesday night to get a photo with the President. On Fox News on Wednesday morning, the hosts were blubbering over their attendance at the event and told viewers to go to their website for photos of the affair.
Unfortunately, when the President claimed “there’s a lot of blame” to go around for the financial and economic crisis, Crowley didn’t follow up by citing the Celent study finding that the claims made by Paulson and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke to justify a socialist takeover of the financial industry were demonstrably false. The study suggests that the result of the bailout could be Weimar-style hyperinflation.
Celent’s report is exhibit A in a trial for putting Paulson in jail,” is how one person responded to my column on the study. This feeling can only grow as awareness spreads through the alternative media about the looting of the taxpayers. It is time for talk radio to make this into the number one issue as we enter a new year. We are increasingly facing a federal government that is acting in a lawless fashion.
Nevertheless, Bush confirmed that his administration was working on a federal financial bailout of the auto industry. A good question would have been: how is that justified when Congress declined to provide the funds?
Bush said the financial system had become “inebriated” and this led to the current crisis. What kind of “democratic” system do we have when the people’s representatives in the House and Senate are bypassed by an executive branch or a Federal Reserve drunk with power?
Why is the Federal Reserve refusing to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request from Bloomberg News for information about “emergency” loans in the crisis? Bloomberg has been forced to go to court to get the information.
In regard to the auto bailout, comedian Jay Leno probably had the best line. He said, “Don’t you love watching congressmen lecture auto executives on how to run their business? I mean, you got people that put us a trillion dollars in debt lecturing people who put us a billion dollars in debt?” The trillion dollar figure, of course, is only a reference to the current projected federal deficit. It could get far larger.
Asked about Madoff, Bush told CNN’s Candy Crowley that he didn’t know much about the case. She should have asked him why the federal government copies Madoff’s accounting procedures.
Peter Schiff of Euro Pacific Capital points out that “The Social Security Administration runs its ‘trust funds’ with precisely the same methods used by Madoff and Ponzi. As money is collected from current workers, the funds are then dispersed to those already receiving benefits. None of the funds collected are actually invested, so no investment returns are ever generated. Those currently paying into the system are expected to receive their returns based on the ‘contribution’ made by future workers.
He adds, “The United States Government runs its own balance sheet based on the Ponzi principal as well. Our national debt always grows and never shrinks. As existing debt matures, proceeds are repaid by issuing new debt. Interest payments on existing debt are also made by selling new debt to investors. The whole scheme depends on an ever growing supply of new lenders, or the willingness of existing lenders, to continue to roll over maturing notes. Of course, as was the case with Madoff, if enough of our creditors want their money back, the music stops playing.”
In terms of the financial “rescue” package, Bloomberg’s latest estimate is that the cost has reached a staggering $7.7 trillion.
A more recent estimate, provided in a Politico.com story by Jeanne Cummings, is $8.7 trillion. She reported, “According to Bianco Research President James Bianco, who crunched these numbers, that amounts to more government aid and assistance than nine other historic bailouts and big government outlays combined.”
A December 10 GAO Report dealt with the so-called TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program), which was supposed to “rescue” the financial system. Paulson changed his mind and TARP became the CPP, a capital purchase program that had provided taxpayer funds to 87 financial institutions as of December 5. However, GAO found that the Treasury Department “has yet to address a number of critical issues. These include determining how it will ensure that CPP is achieving its intended goals and monitoring compliance with limitations on executive compensation, dividend payments, and stock repurchases. Moreover, it has yet to formalize transition planning efforts given the upcoming shift to a new administration or to establish an effective management structure and an essential system of internal controls.”
In other words, there is really no effective oversight and no accountability to the taxpayers providing the money.
Can we start to have some media scrutiny of America’s descent into socialism and national bankruptcy before President Obama asks Congress to “save” us by spending more money and going further into debt?

The Rising Threat of the UAE

(Compiler's note: Another must read.)

by Sultan Knish

Until Dubai

Ports World, a company owned by UAE ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, attempted to buy six major ports in the United States, few Americans were paying serious attention to the rising threat of the UAE.

Where regimes like Iran or Pakistan offer up more direct threats to the West in the form of nuclear arsenals and terrorism sponsorship, the UAE represents a soft threat that may be ultimately be just as dangerous because it is understated.

While the UAE provided 2 of the 9/11 terrorists, had close ties with the Taliban and served a stop on the smuggling network that moved nuclear technology from North Korea to Iran, the UAE has avoided the bellicose confrontational rhetoric, instead operating under the radar.

Where states like Iran or Saddam's Iraq routinely blew their oil money on weapons and a military that could never actually pose a threat to the West in anything except non-conventional weapons, the UAE has relied on the United States to provide regional security, while aggressively pursuing a program of economic conquest of the US and Europe.

The UAE may have many of the same ties to terrorists that Saudi Arabia does, but it has done a far better job with its own public image, building business ties with Western companies and slowly taking them over. The DPW takeover may have been a shock to the system, but it is part of a slow creeping pattern of UAE businesses seizing pieces of the Western economy.

Compared to the brutal tyrannies of Iran or Syria, or the ruthless public suppression of protest in Egypt or the armed militias of Lebanon or Gaza, the UAE seems to show a placid and sunny face of benign despotic family rule. The UAE of course is ultimately a tyranny based around the same system of clan and family interests that dominates much of the Middle East's politics, even when it's disguised by terms like Federation or Prime Minister. But above and beyond that the UAE is Sparta with a warrior class replaced by a business class.

Less than one in seven of the population of the UAE are actual nationals. The rest are mainly foreigners and foreign workers imported to do the work of the favorite sons of the land. And while it might be the Brad Pitts and Angelina Jolies who make the headlines, it is the hundreds of thousands of Southeast Asians slaving away in the homes and palaces, or the small children imported as camel jockeys because of their light weight that make up the real, often enslaved population, of this Sharia friendly Sparta.


The hundreds of thousands of Asians who live in collective labor accommodations resembling slave barracks with no legal rights to speak of, as is commonplace for non-Muslims in a Muslim country, are the real face of the UAE behind the PR spin, the glitzy shots of beaches and glass towers. The UAE, like all tyrannies, is ultimately built up on a base of human misery, oppression and exploitation.

Out of that heart of darkness dressed up in the glamorous light of luxury and opulent wealth, the UAE has advanced steadily into the West. Sharia Finance is a project Made in the UAE and is typical of the UAE's use of economic leverage to impose its power on the West. Even whie UAE royalty steadily financed the Taliban and other Islamic terrorist groups, their economic agenda had a far greater impact in the Clash of Civilizations. Like the airplanes that were flown into the towers, the UAE follows the pattern of Islam employing the modern tools and institutions of the West against it.

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority or ADIA, another corporate spawn of the UAE ruling clan, is the largest shareholder in Citigroup, which plays a key role in the US Treasury Securities market. ADIA wields unknown billions across global financial markets, even as it snaps up real estate in New York and London. Among their acquisitions, the Chrysler building bought from Prudential and the General Motors building, the most expensive building in the world. To place this in the proper perspective, you would have to consider that the same UAE royals who helped finance Al Queda now own some of New York City's most notable surviving buildings.

Lenin boasted that the capitalists would sell him the rope with which he would hang them. But where he failed, the fat burnoosed bandits of the UAE are succeeding. Import-Export enabled the UAE to take hold of the building blocks of international trade, which when combined with international finance, gave them the economic leverage to advance their agenda on a wider playing field. Hollywood is already on the block. With an economy in shambles, tomorrow's movies are being financed out of Dubai, and the investors ultimately gain the deciding power. As Dubai becomes the financial center for Hollywood that New York once was, you can look forward to movies that even further advance the Islamic agenda while degrading America and the West.

And as a double twist of the knife, bringing Hollywood to Dubai along with its drove of celebrities, further mainstreams Islam and Islamic culture in the West. This of course is to be followed by business alliances that will market Dubai created films to American audiences, in exchange for help marketing American films to Middle Eastern audiences. And the next stage of the plan involves treating Hollywood, as the UAE has treated every Western company it has done business with, by first forming entangling business alliances and then taking it over. As today Haliburton, once a leading American company is based out of Dubai, the same fate may yet befall Hollywood, as surreal as that may seem today.

Popular culture is power, and the UAE wants to have that power over the West. Its control over international trade and finance now paves the way for making even greater inroads into the West, for forcing Sharia compliant finance, insuring that Islamic law becomes recognized in Europe, that Islamic ideas are broadcast on film and TV for Western audiences, that the slavemasters of the UAE will even own sizable portions of the cities of their enemies.

Terrorism alone cannot accomplish a victory. It can only serve as a prod. It is the financial conquest of a nation and the resulting transfer of power that is far more devastating. The UAE's silent economic war against the West has brought victory after victory, a war that is all the more devastating because of how covert it is, and how well it hides behind a friendly smile, while a knife is held just out of sight behind a billowing white sheet. Sharia finance is only the opening shot of a far more comprehensive economic takeover of the West, no longer funded by oil money alone, but by the trade, the land and the entertainments of the West.